I suppose that if Clinton were in office and sent our troops to war in Iraq with the same stalemate...?

Question

would all the liberals be calling for his head like as they are for Bush? Or would the libs be calling him a hero and passing the blame for the war onto the Republican controlled Congress?

I have only had a couple REAL answers to this question. This is a hypothetical situation, for you retards that are taking the opportunity to attack me.

Answer 1

Bill dropped more bombs on Slobodan than all of the '91 gulf war-(i'm not opposed to him doing that, btw) If liberals were so concerned about the suffering of innocent ppl, where were they then? and where are they for somalia? liberals don't realize they would have no freedoms if someone wasn't willing to fight to preserve our freedoms.
these ppl are an internal cancer bent on destroying themselves.
wonder how long these liberals would last living in iraq or iran?

Answer 2

Despite what you or anyone else may want to think, there are many people who base their judgment of a president on his actions. You can bet that, if Clinton handled a war the way Bush has handled the Iraq war, the outcry would be the same. Where are the American people for Somalia? Our hands are tied. It is up to our illustrious leaders to decide which war to fight and our illustrious leaders have decided in their infinite wisdom that Iraq is the place to be. I can think of a hundred other places we could be better spending our money, resources and god forbid, young boys' lives. And I agree with the previous answerer as well. Clinton most definitely would have been called on the carpet for 9/11. He never would've sailed through it like Bush has. Of course, Clinton never resorted to waving the flag and hiding behind patriotism to deflect attention from his failings. He, albeit slowly, stood up and acknowledged what he did. Well over four years later the Iraq war, which has lasted longer than World War I, World War II, the Korean Conflict or the Vietnam war, Bush still cannot admit that he screwed up.

Answer 3

Actually, the Republican Congress would have impeached Clinton for 9/11 if it had happened under his watch. There's still never been a true accounting of how Condi Rice and her crew ignored the intelligence that was available in 2001.

Answer 4

Because the thought of the army being in Iraq, is that it's within the pursuits of each the USA and the Iraqis. It could also be within the pursuits of the USA to stifle debate at the conflict by way of exporting the protestors ( that is controversial). It is tough to look the way it could be within the Iraqi's pursuits to receive them although.

Answer 5

we all know clinton is SMART, EDUCATED, and SENSIBLE and bush well IS NOT! clinton was the laid back type but yet got the job done..bush on the other hand is up-tight and lost doing what he feels will best suit him and his image but ooops! now he got himself knee deep in sh!t and every one hates his @ss quite understandably..im sure there are many variables in these situations but you cant deni the president, current president is faulty..personally id prefer a president who gets oral in his office and have world peace opposed to an uneducated president who is creating world war

Answer 6

Clinton had eight years in office to start a useless war and needlessly kill thousands of U.S. troops. However he didn't do this, so your question is pointless.

Answer 7

Ever notice when the Bushies get boxed into a corner, they whip out the "Clinton Card"?

Answer 8

Clinton would have had the sense to confine the conflict where it belonged in Afghanistan.

Have a nice day!

Answer 9

What does it matter? He's not in office, hasn't been for around 6 years now. Why don't you fools get past it, Slick Willy was a better president. Bill lied, no one died.

Answer 10

If clinton wasent too busy getting ahead with monica,he could have put a stop to obama before he became infamous.