English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
0

i am unsure so plez correct me if im wrong.

there is only one rule tautologys follow
- a tautology is only true if it contains no contradiction.

yet that rule is built using tautology,
i therefore ask is the non-contradiction tautology the tautology of tautology's.

2007-01-09 02:32:11 · 4 answers · asked by kevin h 3 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

4 answers

I believe that would be called a "metatautology".

But you're getting into the world of Gödel there. Next you'd demand a "tautology of the tautology of tautologies", a "metametautology".....

Just go out and buy Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid instead.

2007-01-09 02:43:57 · answer #1 · answered by Jim Burnell 6 · 0 0

I assume you're talking about logic.

A tautology is a logic statement that is true for any possible set of truth values

e.g. (A \/ B) \/ (¬A /\ ¬B)

By definition, a tautology is always true, so a sentence beginning "a tautology is only true if" is nonsensical.

2007-01-09 02:42:16 · answer #2 · answered by Tom :: Athier than Thou 6 · 0 0

I think a tautology is when to near synonyms are placed next to each other for added effect:

ie., a free gift, a new innovation



In math it is a problem in propositional calc that is always true.

2007-01-09 02:42:23 · answer #3 · answered by sweetsouth 3 · 0 0

You're asking if you can violate the basic axiom of tautologies. The answer is no.

2007-01-09 02:56:11 · answer #4 · answered by bequalming 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers