I have heard all about cutting funding and cutting and running out of Iraq. These are not strategies to win, but to quit. I want specifics. The President's plan in Iraq has been to teach the Iraqi people to defend themselves, not to have complete peace. We are there now to help the Iraqi people to defend themselves. So save the Republicans have no plan crap because I just listed it.
2007-01-09 02:03:48 · 16 answers · asked by GOPneedsarealconservative 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
One word: appeasement!
Those European nations in the 1930s learned the hard way when trying the same thing with Hitler and Nazi Germany.
Non-aggression pact, my @$$!
2007-01-09 02:13:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
The Democrats plan to win the war by taking all the funding and giving it to insurance companies so that everyone will have medical insurance. This way all the jobless/useless people can have more babies. Then in a few years when the GOP take back control we can start all over again. Loose more Americans next time in Iraq and the circle never ends! For once in the history of the USA let's finish what we start!
2007-01-09 02:13:08 · answer #2 · answered by Mrs. T 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
You know thats a very good question, and I want to see a plan of attack myself. The sad thing is Bush doesn't even know what it is either.
QUESTION: Can we win [the war on terrorism]?
DUBYA: I don't think you can win it. But I think you can create conditions so that the -- those who use terror as a tool are -- less acceptable in parts of the world.
-- Oh, so we can't win the war? Well that sort of comes as a surprise. Interview aired on NBC's "Today Show", Aug. 30, 2004
2007-01-09 02:25:56 · answer #3 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
nicely lady friend it does seem that 19 Dems contained in the Senate did not opt for the pull out at present remedy. so as that they proceed to clutter with the money yet lack the testicular fortitude to enact an ideological consistent remedy to the branch of their caucus. maximum libs call for resign, in spite of the undeniable fact that many are squeamish about the French syndrome. it really is in the previous Sarkozy
2016-12-28 12:41:23 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The war in Iraq is not the war on terrorism. No one will win the war on terrorism because there will always be terrorists. Ignorance is strength.
2007-01-09 02:17:40 · answer #5 · answered by Scruzzer 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
You can't win a "war on terrorism", and the people who came up with that phrase know this. You can win a war on entities but not on tactics or behaviours.
2007-01-09 02:14:09 · answer #6 · answered by devil's advocate 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hugs and kisses
Dollies and Faery Princesses
The guy below me is right, obviously Iraq has nothing to do with terror. Those Kurds and Shias killed themselves. The bombs and IEDs were planted by Santa.
2007-01-09 02:06:22 · answer #7 · answered by Celebrate Life 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
1. Declare victory and retreat.
2. Sign UN resolutions against terrorism
3. Embrace Hamas and Hizbollah like Clinton embraced IRA and PLO.
4. Blame Bush when we get attacked again.
2007-01-09 02:18:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
The plan is to win by giving up.
2007-01-09 02:07:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
What is your plan? Enlisting and fighting in this war? I didnt think so.
I am so sick of NeoCon Couch Warriors.
2007-01-09 02:17:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋