Do you think if there are future acts of terrorism against the US or its citizens it will be blamed on?

Question

President Bush, linking it to Iraq and/or his so called lack of foreign relations?

Answer 1

Not at all. All the previous terrorist acts against the US and its citizens are not the fault of Bush, so blaming future ones on him makes no sense at all. This will not stop the Democrats and other Bush-haters from doing so, but, as usual, it will not be the truth.

We've suffered terrorist attacks from jihadist Muslims against the US, its citizens and its troops for almost 3 decades, from the seizure of the US embassy in Teheran to the Marine barracks in Lebanon, to the bombing of German disco filled with US troops, to the murder on the Achille Lauro, to the bombing of the Pan Am flight over Lockerbie, to the 1st WTC bombing, the Khobar towers bombing, the bombings of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, the attack on the USS Cole and, of course, 9/11. (not an exhaustive list, but you get the picture.)

None of these were attributable to President Bush, nor has his actions or policies changed anything about the special hatred the ignorant jihadist scum hold for the US. They dislike our policies, and blame the failure of Muslim society on others, rather than open their minds or eyes to acknowledge that their jihadist ways keep them mired in the 8th century, and keep them mentally and morally impoverished.

Answer 2

Bush learned from his inaction in the days preceding 9/11. He had warnings and the FBI as well as several other agencies all dropped the ball. As a former great President once said, "The Buck stops here." Truman was right then, and it is still right now. Bush had the security briefing from the outgoing administration, and other reports prior to 9/11, nothing was done and over 3000 people paid with their lives. Contrary to popular opinion there have been terrorist attacks in this country since then, and there are more coming. It isn't as if the only terrorists are Islamic. If there isn't a terrorist attack somewhere in the US in the next month it would be a shock.

Church burning is terrorism.
Spray painting threats on a synagogue is terrorism.
Murdering a doctor because he works at Planned Parenthood is terrorism.
Bombing a clinic is terrorism.
The DC snipers were terrorists.

Since when are acts intended to create terror and fear the sole property of fundamentalist Islamics? Domestic terrorism is far more rampant than most people would even know.

Answer 3

First, I don't believe another attack is an if, but rather a when. Second there is a certain percentage of the population which blame Bush for everything that happens. For these people future terrorist attacks will be no exception. However, if you consider it from an honest standpoint you will notice that the opposition is always blamed. There are still people blaming Clinton for terrorism. The only proper group to place blame on for terrorism are the terrorists, but it is impossible for many people to separate politics from the equation.

Answer 4

an occupation- how long have you ever long previous to college? it rather is not thoroughly set up in Iraq - If the international replaced into so easy as you declare it to be - you have the flexibility to run it. regrettably issues are very complicated - we could desire to stay till their forces are thoroughly as much as par - then we are able to pass. that's somewhat complicated to comprehend- you're claiming what a million intelligence company mentioned purely a million time - properly in the U. S. there are approximately 23 Intelligence businesses. If we are much less risk-free then previously - properly think of roughly all the lifeless Al Qaeda over there - and the lifeless Al qaeda leaders. the comments from dozens of others aspects that have been displaying that Al Qaeda is turning out to be un common in some middleastern aspects You suggestions remains working on some year old. you declare pointless and illogical wars- why did Clinton do significant great scale bomobings of Iraq two times jointly as he replaced into in workplace? why replaced into the IAEA scared shitless - why did the United international locations bypass selection after selection against Iraq. Why did Iraq provide up Inspectors from traveling the web pages in questions and why are those comparable web pages thoroughly empty - while we invaded no longer something yet shells of homes - each and every thing stripped.

Answer 5

Throughout history, man has searched for a scapegoat. The easiest and most accessible target is usually picked. In this case its Bush. I am NOT a Bush fan, but I think its irresponsible and ridiculous to blame him for future terror attacks. I think its also dangerous...it takes attention away from the terrorists...which plays right into their hands. A country divided is easier to attack - particularly if no one is keeping their eyes out for the real enemy.

Blame Bush for being a liar, a hypocrite and generally, an imbecile. But keep priorities straight.

Answer 6

The terrorists are already trained and programmed to hate the US and were before 9/11 and other attacks. Some in our own country will of course blame it on Bush. We just can't follow that line of thinking that we deserve to be attacked and expect to keep our freedom.

Answer 7

If a Terrorist attacks civilians in Israel or the UK they call it a attack on the USA. These mindless mass murderers have attacked our allies all over the world. Each time they attack our allies they have been attacking the USA, in that distorted mind. It is a lie that we have not been attacked, our allies have been attacked many times.
Bush is going down the same old path, of trying to connect Iraq with Sept. 11th. Even after Bush said "Iraq and Sept. 11th. are not connected, I never said they were connected".

Answer 8

I am not a Bush advocate and believe that terrorists only want excuses to pull off their bloody acts of terror. Bush is irrelevant to terrorism.

Answer 9

I think the invasion in Iraq has created more future problems than we could possibly imagine. Bush should not have cut and run in Afghanistan going after Bin Ladin.

Answer 10

N O!! It'll be blamed on the AlQaida terrorists and Iran!!