2007-01-09 00:06:43 · 29 answers · asked by Alyosha 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Gordon Brown for me, i bet he eats swans and stuff like that.
2007-01-09 00:12:16 · answer #1 · answered by tommo 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Uncle Kim is the most dangerous, but has no oil, and he's more of a threat to China at the moment.
Of course the neo-conmen are dying to go after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who really has no power, just a big mouth. All the real political power in Iran resides with the Supreme Ayatollahs.
AIPAC and the israel lobby will hammer away at the Congress until they get their way, or else the IDF will attack Iran and force our hand, leaving us to clean up the mess, like we're doing so well in Iraq.
Chavez is hardly a dictator, but he's dicking with the oil companies which makes him a "terrorist".
Bad as he was, Saddam ran a secular regime, something very rare in Southwest Asia. If he hadn't taken our word for it when we told him it was okay to annex Kuwait he'd still be in business, acting as a counterweight to Iran.
2007-01-09 00:25:50 · answer #2 · answered by normanbormann 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The USA must have or create a new super DEMON to criticise so the hate has now to be concentrated on North Korea and Iran.
You will note Osama Bin Laden and Ghaddafi are not mentioned any more.
The USA mentality is a bit like a script from Marvel Comics the Demon and the Super Hero concept over and over again
2007-01-09 02:09:57 · answer #3 · answered by ian d 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
For a majority of the world, Fidel Castro has been the favourite for many, many years. But I say that in the good sense. It is only the United States that views him as an evil dictator...he has garnered tremendous respect in most other countries.
2007-01-09 00:51:50 · answer #4 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i could have enjoyed to work out Rage against the gadget in stay overall performance. quite, in college, i offered tickets, and become broke for some month via fact of those tickets.. and approximately 2-3 weeks earlier they have been meant to circulate on excursion, the band broke up.. I have been given my money decrease back.. yet nonetheless.. I regarded forward to that prepare for see you later.. ate alot of ramen in that factor... *sigh*
2016-12-12 07:36:22 · answer #5 · answered by kleckner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Castro - but he's not going to be around long.
Chavez - but he's a slimy little greaseball
Kim Jong Il - but he's too bizarre to embrace
I guess the leftists of the world feel a huge loss, not knowing which tyrant to fete.
2007-01-09 00:37:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
President Bush.
2007-01-09 00:15:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Kim of north Korea or Mugabe of Zimbabwe. though bush seems to be anti Iran at the minute
2007-01-09 01:51:58 · answer #8 · answered by The Fat Controller 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
George Bush.
2007-01-09 00:10:53 · answer #9 · answered by radiance 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
As the saying goes the proof is in the pudding
It is GEORGE W. BUSH
2007-01-09 00:25:40 · answer #10 · answered by rose 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
He'd have to ignore what the majority of the people wanted, have delusions of grandeur and take away our freedoms. I"ll go with George Bush on this one.
2007-01-09 00:11:15 · answer #11 · answered by Debra D 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋