if saddam had been given 1 execution for killing 148 people then Bush should be hanged 100 times for killing more than 14800 civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq
2007-01-09 00:05:47 · 33 answers · asked by Cool 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ya u r right if i get a chance i would tell this in front of bush and ask him with what right is he doing all this after all saddam was an elected person.
if he was a dictator then what is musharraf go hang him too he killed many indians
2007-01-09 23:25:53 · answer #1 · answered by Ali 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO, while not condoning it ... What Saddam did was in his own country and probably it is an internal matter ... just like in the USA the discrimination of Blacks,asians, hispanics continues at the behest of governmental forces and also the way the Americans have disregarded the voices of other nations while going to war just for the sake of OIL and having control over it.
Then it is in all fairness to the people of the world that President Bush/ Prime minister Tony Blair should also be bought in front of the international court for crime againt humans and tried by a very loose court and then should face the same kind of justice that saddam did.
The present governments of Both UK & USA are only leading their respective people down a very long and dark tunnel , which their citizens do not deserve !!
2007-01-09 17:02:47 · answer #2 · answered by muddu a 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Was it right? That's for history to tell. But according to the jurisprudence of the new Iraqi government, it was the sentence for ordering the murder of innocent people. Oh, and the trials against Saddam will continue, in order to expose the murders of hundreds of thousands more Iraqis.
As for President Bush, he did not order the murder of anybody. And the number of innocent civilians accidentally killed during the liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq is significantly less than the number you quote.
The prinicipal idea here is the deliberate murder of innocents versus the unintentional killing of civilians during military conflict. There is a significant legal and moral difference between the two, and most people have no problem distinguishing the difference.
2007-01-09 00:35:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What is right or wrong who will decide? Certainely Not Americans. Yes saddam is a cruel monster to his own people and its neighbours. Like saddam there are 100's of dictators in the world. Who are Americans to decide about others fate,
remember Americans if you guys start meddling in others affairs and that too to suit your posture then please accept one fact that some body will come one day and give you the taste of the same medicine.
As of yesterday it was the soviet union so you guys kept yourself, Now Russia is quiet, but it will not be too late if you do not mend your ways, Russia would emerge again as protector of the oppresed.
2007-01-09 16:08:15 · answer #4 · answered by Loganathan R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If really Bush like to wipe out terrorism from the world; killing of sadam is vindicated; included he must also fight hard to find other hardcore terrorist outfits like Mullah, Laden and Mushraf sponsored organizations. If Bush can do that Saddam's killing is somehow justified. I think Bush must consider Kashmir as an important issue and must strive hard to give valuable solution to terrorism in these Places.
If he joins with other terrorist; killing of Saddam is a big WRONG!
2007-01-09 13:05:04 · answer #5 · answered by Desmond craig 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was a monster who killed, tortured and raped his own people and his sons were just as bad. War kills both bad and innocent people and it has always been that way.
You have every right not to agree with President Bush but putting it the way you did I think it is so hateful and what kind of message does that send to our soldiers that have given their life for their country. Only history will prove whether this war was right or wrong.
2007-01-09 00:17:57 · answer #6 · answered by Diane H 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Not the same thing. Saddam was killing his own people for years. Invading a country and racking up collateral damage is different.
2007-01-09 00:22:14 · answer #7 · answered by ropemancometh 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
You only need to take a look at the latest pictures released on the web to conclude that this hanging has nothing to do with justice: it is a sadistic and gruesome murder carried out as vengeance. Bush and his Iraqi puppet Al-Maliki: the blood of thousands of Americans and Iraqis will forever be on your hands.
2007-01-09 00:35:18 · answer #8 · answered by Paleologus 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am not a muslim, but I agree with you. He is not the first leader to kill 148 people. There are hundreds of leaders killing thousands of innocent people. In India we had a lady who brewed hooch which killed more than 325 people, she is a peoples representative in the corporation of Bangalore now. Please, Bush and america are not innocent, they have also killed thousands, they sold their unsold ammunition to kuwait, during the war.
2007-01-09 03:52:45 · answer #9 · answered by mamakumar 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. He has the the main suitable option to allure the sentence. If he's unsuccessful then he ought to be hanged interior 30 days of the denial of his allure. If he's performed this is not until after the 1st of the 365 days.
2016-10-30 10:17:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋