2007-01-08 23:34:51 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
How about "gross incompetence"?
2007-01-09 00:27:58 · update #1
Insanity, yes, but not grounds for impeachment.
2007-01-08 23:59:45 · answer #1 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The act of taking America into war is not a reason for impeachment. It is well within the President's Constitutional powers.
2007-01-08 23:57:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush should be impeached for how 9/11 was mishandled. He is no hero. If a younger Ronald Reagan was in the White House in 2001 Do you believe the Twin Towers would still be standing? Hell Yeah! I have found credible evidence that George Sr Bush was in Washington Dc with Bin ladens Family and that George Bush was infact coordinating The attacks against our own people. Look at one view. Bush wanted to spare the lives on the airliners. wouldn't it be strategically better to shoot down the airliners to save the lives of the people in the buildings plus to save the buildings themselves?? And has anyone bothered to research Bush's family history?? His granddad bankrolled Nazi Germany In one of my URLs i will have a place where we can sign a letter of impeachment if any of you are over 18 and a registered voter please sign
2007-01-08 23:56:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
If Nancy Polocy tries to raise 5 taxes that is grounds for impeachement. Get your pens out, here she comes!
2007-01-08 23:57:54 · answer #4 · answered by Art S 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
no, but be ready for the draft to be reinstated if that happens. Current manpower in the military wouldn't cover it.
2007-01-08 23:45:28 · answer #5 · answered by krzylove 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
silly
2007-01-08 23:40:24 · answer #6 · answered by just curious 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
2007-01-08 23:42:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋