English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Neither. There will always be wars and rumors of wars. There always have been, and nothing is going to change anytime soon, except possibly the adversaries.

2007-01-08 23:37:35 · answer #1 · answered by Christian A 3 · 1 0

the favored verdict that there is greater effective than meets the attention is surely very precise, yet no longer in any sinister direction. There are reasons that, in spite of the undeniable fact that particularly noble, may well be damageing to announce brazenly. it is not purely a war on terrorism, that replaced right into a reasonably stupid reason to furnish, and removing the madman replaced right into a small in spite of the undeniable fact that valid purpose. the justifications are there on a plenty wider point however the known public are fickle and those with perception particularly normally ought to act earlier than the blunting democratic technique. i understand what that announces yet with a better share of stupid human beings in each and every inhabitants, and the uninformed, democracy is kinda insufficient to todays desires. nonetheless, Bush particular does fall into that stupid classification regrettably. So no, to respond to your question, terrorism replaced into no longer the inspiration reason, however the justifications are good.

2016-10-06 21:28:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

no i dont think that the war in iraq finished terrorism, nor was it the start. it will always be here. sadly....

2007-01-08 23:32:56 · answer #3 · answered by laura s 3 · 1 0

I think it is helping but terrorism will never end because there will always be wackos. The idea is to abolish organized terrorism.

2007-01-08 23:32:02 · answer #4 · answered by Alexandra 4 · 1 1

Dude, terrorism was happening to us when Jimmy Carter was prez. You cannot blame this one on George W. Bush, sorry!

2007-01-08 23:30:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Not start or end. It was a kind of governmental terrorism.

2007-01-08 23:31:05 · answer #6 · answered by mhrhashemi 3 · 0 0

It's part of the process. Neither the beginning nor the ending.

2007-01-08 23:30:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Neither

2007-01-08 23:33:50 · answer #8 · answered by Lolitta 7 · 1 0

it voz d start-and til its on-terrorism is goin to keep on erupting

2007-01-08 23:31:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Neither one!

2007-01-08 23:35:06 · answer #10 · answered by cats 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers