I would expect nature to revert the hominoid behaviors to a more basic inclusive anthropoid state. humans are not so much different then animals.
2007-01-08 23:23:00 · 10 answers · asked by Avskull 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
the last poster of my last question will bring light to this question
2007-01-08 23:30:08 · update #1
Erv-inks mathematical formulation isnt publish i dont know what its is reference to when it comes to quantifying human behavior in a numatical form opposed to an empirical basis. with out that i dont believe you.
2007-01-08 23:37:41 · update #2
I would like to agree, but I just can't.
2007-01-08 23:27:07 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, ideally, hominoid idiosyncrasy are mutually Not exclusive from anthropomorphic behavior.
I base this on the this on the Erv-inks model of elemental formulations devised at Cambridge university (1894). This formula extracts from the universe, elemental properties (all those known in the universe) and converts them into Erv-inks mathematical formulation of cyclic quantum's. Therein one is able to deduce in mathematical deviations of each elements concise properties, qualities and quantities, multiply by rarities on a fixed trans-metric means (there is at best a .0654 trans-metric deviation-depending on the fluctuation of each introversion of compounds on the standard deviation ANOVA correlation of the animals and humans in their basic inclusive anthropoid state.)
2007-01-08 23:31:24 · answer #2 · answered by †ђ!ηK †αηK² 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
obviously ordinary experience says no. there have been an noticeably large quantity of philosophers which have depending their philosophies off of spirituality. all and sundry who bases their existence off of a faith is utilising a non secular philosophy. in truth many philosophies use spirituality as their foundation. i'm not declaring that that's the sensible route to maintain on with. i'm basically declaring that those paths genuinely exist.
2016-10-17 00:27:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow, you should go to the education section, this is way too intelligent this early in the morning. your waaaaay over my head !
2007-01-08 23:38:56 · answer #4 · answered by gymspirit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Will you please stop reading out of your College Freshman Psychology book? if you have question's about it go ask your professor in about 3 hours...
2007-01-08 23:26:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
whats that in english words
2007-01-08 23:27:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You lost me me at hello
2007-01-08 23:34:03 · answer #7 · answered by Money 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah
2007-01-08 23:26:28 · answer #8 · answered by Jelly Brotha 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you swallow the dictionary?
2007-01-08 23:26:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
true
2007-01-08 23:37:50 · answer #10 · answered by v 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋