Will this "surge" save Iraq?

Question

I do not see a lot of support for this mission and please remind me, what exactly are we supposed to be doing over there in the first place ?

Answer 1

No it wont make much of a difference, as when its over it is up to the iraqui's to stop their own violence. There is a civil war going on there, why are we even involved, lets move on, thats not cutting and tunning, we deposed their dictator, so let them decide how they wish and by whom they wish to be governed. Maybe we should now send our troops after those who ramed the jets into our buildings? INstaed of playing middle man or cop in Iraq

Answer 2

Who knows? Might be the last best chance. As for why we're there were there to try and make something meaningful out of the place for the Iraqi people. Although for all the heat we seem to be taking from the media and our so called allies I'm starting to think any new conflict should just involve a toppling of the government, a capture of those who we need to get and then a departure with finical aid.

Answer 3

Absolutely not. We are wasting our time on Iraq in my opinion. The problem is and has been Iran. Why we even bothered to invade Iraq a second time Is beyond me? They were living up to their end of the peace accords that we gave them at the end of the gulf war. Look at recent history. Rewind to 1990. George Bush Sr is in the White House. Collin Powell was National Security Advisor. Iraq had just finished an 8 year war with its neighbor Iran dating 1980 to 1988. It really wanted to be at peace.
Collin Powell framed the people of Iraq. The man should face the music. He is a war criminal. HE IS THE ONE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN EXECUTED LAST YEAR! Before you slam my story read my URLs it will back me up. We have no business In Iraq to make a long story short. We are the invaders and we are infact an occupying force and i say again the problem is infact IRAN

Answer 4

GEORGE BUSH isn't against STEM cellular study. he's FOR STEM cellular study that doesn't comprise THE KILLING OF a skill HUMAN to keep yet another person. there's a lot of STEM CELLS IN a baby'S UMBILICAL twine that would desire to be USED in case you will study ALL OF this you'll locate IT TO BE actual. as a strategies because of the fact the conflict IN IRAQ the protection rigidity that are THERE ARE ENLISTED men and females. they chosen TO combat. it fairly is a think approximately their interest. they suspect IN FREEDOM and that they are SO HEROIC AND brave. SADDAM became KILLING AND MAIMING men, females, babies. the people OF IRAQ VOTED WITH the utmost record OF VOTES EVER TO BE set unfastened FROM TYRANNY... SADDAM GASSED HIS own people by technique of THE hundreds. HE became SO cruel..TORTURED harmless people by technique of reducing off THEIR palms, palms. TORTURE properties have been discovered throughout IRAQ. weapons OF MASS DESTRUCTION have been THERE until now WE WENT IN. THE U.N. AND CONGRESS have been at the back of US GOING INTO IRAQ because of the fact SADDAM became A threat. WE DEFENDED SAUDI ARABIA because of the fact SADDAM became INVADING THEM. that throughout turn secure OUR OIL interest. you would be PAYING ASTRONOMICAL expenses FOR gas OR walking suited now IF WE weren't THERE. in charge GEO BUSH FOR each thing IS RIDICULES. we've not BEEN ATTACKED because of the fact that 9-11 provide the guy some credit.

Answer 5

Support is not a concern. Public opinion never won a war. That is accomplished by force of arms.

Will the surge save Iraq? Maybe. Maybe not. Better to try and fail than to be a Liberal and support terrorism with inaction.

Answer 6

Not likely.

A surge of troops can only mean a surge in violence.

The best they can do is prevent the violence from spreading to the surrounding countries; but that doesn't seem to be part of the plan.

Answer 7

The stupid jerks thought that by killing me would make it better in Iraq.but look at it now.STUPID AMERICANS...