2007-01-08 19:02:52 · 5 answers · asked by -.- 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
The property of not-having-a-property is, itself, a property - so no.
2007-01-08 19:07:17 · answer #1 · answered by Andrew 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You describe or distinct objects by properties.
You may dispute whether "nothing" has properties (e.g. property "consisting of something" is empty) or whether it has no properties (in that case "nothing" has no properties). But "nothing" is definitely no object, therefore, objects must have properties.
Same also goes for concepts, like "identity".
2007-01-09 03:26:15 · answer #2 · answered by BataV 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everything in exsistance has either mass, volume or occupies space, there by having properties.... even air....
2007-01-12 02:26:53 · answer #3 · answered by deanna.brownlee@verizon.net 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, our identites.
Unless you mean an object that doesn't have an owner. if it's not related to my answer then I'm confused since you r not giving details.
2007-01-09 03:05:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes its possible
2007-01-09 03:07:58 · answer #5 · answered by haromustafa 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋