Can somebody explain this paradox?

Question

1.
The speed of quantum of light is absolute quantity c=1.
But why does everyone say that there is no absolute
speed of motion?
2.
The speed of quantum of light is absolute only in
Vacuum, in absolute Vacuum.
But why does everyone say that there is no
absolute reference system?
===============
Can somebody explain this paradox?
http://www.socratus.com

Answer 1

There is no paradox involved.
We never say that the speed of light is not absolute.It is in fact absolute because it is same whether seen form any frame of reference.

But speed of "matter" is not 'absolute'.Since matter has mass so It can never be accelerated in such a way so that it attain speed of light. So its speed 'depends' on the frame of reference and is not an ABSOLUTE QUANTITY.

Coming to Ur second query,
"The speed of quantum of light is absolute only in
Vacuum, in absolute Vacuum"

But a vacuum is not a "frame of reference". When we say a reference system then we talk about a reference place relative to which we can describe the speed of any matter.

Take an example, In an "absolute vac ***", I am going in a car with speed 100 m/hr with respect to U. I am watching another car going in same direction also with speed 100 m/hr with respect to U.
now I describe car 'at rest' and U describe car as "going with speed 100 m/hr".

So U see a vacuum is just a state of space where we say that "nothing" lies in that space but it is not a frame of reference. A vacuum can have infinite individual frame of references for describing speed of matter. But in all these frames light will have same speed, 'c'.

This paradox arise because U have confused and mixed motion of light (which is absolute) with the motion of matter (which is frame dependent).

Answer 2

The speed of light is a constant, not an absolute. The value of the light speed (c) depends on the medium the light is passing through. Thus, for example, c(vacuum) > c(water); which is why a pencil seems to bend where it enters a glass of water.

If c were absolute, c(vacuum) = c(water) = c(anything) would be true. But it isn't absolute; so this is not true.

Absolute means a value that is invariable...period. Absolute zero (0 deg K) is absolute because it is zero no matter when and where it is enountered.

Answer 3

1. There is no absolute speed of motion for objects with mass.

2. Because there isn't. Vacuum does not a reference system make. If an area of space is in vacuum it will be in vacuum regardless of what reference system you are using.

Answer 4

Absolute means fixed.

Synonym of absolute is relative or variable.

Speed of light is fixed or absolute.

It will not vary with the observer’s (say A’s) speed.

It is independent of the speed of the observer A.

Whatever is A’s speed A will measure the speed of light in vacuum as a fixed quantity say C.

The speed of light is not relative to the observer but it is absolute.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The observer A measures the speed of another observer B as a variable one.

It depends upon the relative speed of observer A and B.

For observer A, the speed of B can vary from zero to the maximum value C.

The speed of B is not fixed.

The speed of B is not absolute and also it is relative to the speed of A.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The observer A observes the speed of B.

He can observe the speed of C, D, E, F and so on who are having varying speeds from zero to C.

He can observe infinite number of reference frames from his reference frame.

He takes a point which is at rest with respect to him and measures the speed of others.

All other reference frames are moving with different speeds (from zero to C).

Thus the speeds of other reference frames are not fixed; they are variable.

They are not absolute.

Now coming to the speed of A, it is not also absolute. It is because, each one of the other observers will find the speed of A with reference to his frame of reference and each one will have different values of speed of A ranging from zero to C.

Thus there is no absolute reference frame in the universe.

Answer 5

there's no "absolute speed of action" because it would want to in consumer-friendly words be defined relativistically. Any measurement of exact action will continuously rely upon your body of reference. as an example: i might want to assert that my laptop is shifting at 0 miles in step with hour. in spite of the undeniable fact that, relative to the solar, both my laptop and that i are shifting at thousands of miles in step with hour, as is a few thing of this wide dirtball ("Earth," or so i'm advised) that we are sitting on. the speed of light, in spite of the undeniable fact that, isn't depending on one's body of reference, in consumer-friendly words on its propogation medium. no matter if I were travelling at 186,000 miles in step with second relative to the solar, (or the earth, or the different reachable reference), i might want to nonetheless be conscious gentle to be travelling at c. Cool, huh? the reason that there's no "absolute reference device" is all reference platforms are inevitably arbitrary. think we take the earth because the middle of our reference device -- nicely, it truly is shifting around the solar. nicely, now think that we concentration on the solar -- the solar is itself shifting about the middle of the galaxy. And the galaxy is shifting outward from the middle of the universe for that reason of the tremendous Bang. even if that we knew the precise region of the tremendous Bang, it would want to nonetheless be an arbitary consider words of its relation to area. it would want to nonetheless be in action in words of three different factor. An "absolute reference device" type of presupposes some thing like the idea of the "ether," which become discredited by way of the Michaelson-Morley experiments about a century in the past. It in consumer-friendly words is smart if there is a few type of table sure substance for the duration of which each little thing else strikes. If the vacuum of area extremely is the vacuum of area, then reference platforms will continuously be relative. apparently, you are able to teach this even without particular relativity, etc.

Answer 6

No because if we did, time would explode and thus we would die or freeze in time

Answer 7

AAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! youve given me a headache, I;m havin enough problems with prime numbers.