English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Havoc.

2007-01-08 17:08:55 · answer #1 · answered by JHAMAINE E 2 · 0 0

many women do already.

there isn't anything wrong with that except that the whole structure of men and women is different for good reason. in my mind, man and woman are meant to be the two halves of a complete whole the only outstanding criteria being compatibility.

most women who wish for such things seem to have these desires after negative experiences with the opposite sex.......directly or indirectly. it's a shame that so many people cannot display their true intelligence unless/until they're pissed off somehow.

2007-01-09 01:25:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

Desirable!

2007-01-09 01:09:17 · answer #3 · answered by yolkyolk 5 · 0 0

Yes to the exception in the physical sense, but women are stronger because in nature, women out live man, there fore women are the strongest at the end.

2007-01-09 02:21:27 · answer #4 · answered by non existance 2 · 1 0

There was a study done recently that showed that women become aroused just as strongly (and much of the time, as quickly) as men to visual stimuli. (If I can find the paper, I'll post the link!)
It's a myth that women are not as 'sexual' as men. We just need a bit more time to reach our peak. Women ARE, however, more likely to equate sex with love and so it's my belief that women have (in some ways) forced themselves to be less sexual so as not to become emotionally involved and possibly hurt.

2007-01-09 01:15:46 · answer #5 · answered by Mars 2 · 1 1

Like gay men before aids, many partners, every day.

2007-01-09 01:14:01 · answer #6 · answered by charlie at the lake 6 · 1 0

There would certainly be a better equity in theings and women would not be so demeaned

2007-01-09 01:12:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Interesting! Do not hold your breath, though, it is biologically very unlikely.

2007-01-09 01:12:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think there would be a lot more babies being born.

2007-01-09 01:26:30 · answer #9 · answered by nonyobuziness 2 · 1 1

that would a problem!!!!!

2007-01-09 01:17:44 · answer #10 · answered by Kas-O 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers