So, the Taliban are poised to retake Kandahar this spring....?

Question

And Bush's response is to withdraw a US battalion in this beseiged area, in order to send them to Iraq...

Which begs the question - how many wars can 1 president lose?

Jmiah - looks like yet another Bush supporter isn't aware of the basic realities we face. Here. Why not get yourself up to speed:

http://www.theolympian.com/101/story/59639.html

Matt and SAEide - Oops. Check the link above. This is coming from the top commanders in Afghanistan. But thank you for proving (yet again) how uniformed you Bush supporters are....

Answer 1

Yeah, when that doesn't happen, you'll be on to the next lie.

Answer 2

Well...I hardly think we have lost any wars yet with 3/4 of the top terrorist leaders dead! And I hardly think the Taliban is going to retake Kandahar. There *IS* more than one front to the war on terror you know. And look how the US troops were spread during WWII? But of COURSE I guess that is different since Americans have become so feminized. They get weak kneed at the first sight of blood and want to turn and run. We'd all be speaking German if the American people did not support the troops WHOLE heartedly during WWII. Even Hollywood...which is a SHOCKING concept seeing as how most of them are socialists now.

Answer 3

Thanks General, I'm sure you know more about whats going on there than the Commander in Chief.


I'm sure they as well as you have looked at the crystal ball and seen the future. On top of that commanders in the field are always know to say" No Sir, I don't need any more troops here, I wouldn't know where to put them" .

you are a jacka$$

Answer 4

The correct response to your question is indeed "Bring 'em on". The Taliban run faster than the French. lol.

Answer 5

3, one in Iraq, one in Afghanistan, and one in the polls