English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It seems like you are just losing information when rounding and leaving people to guess your uncertainty rather than to put (number)±(uncertainty)

2007-01-08 15:23:02 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Physics

People! Saying ±(uncertainty) conveys the unvertainty better than sig. figs.!

2007-01-08 16:06:04 · update #1

3 answers

Significant figures are a way for scientists to convey how much precision a measurement or other value has. For example, if I measured my textbook, I could not say with certainty that it is 22.37090000 centimeters across beacuse I simply cannot measure that precisely. More appropriately, I’d say the textbook measured 22.4 centimeters across.

2007-01-08 15:33:04 · answer #1 · answered by jamaica 5 · 0 0

With some measurements the uncertantity comes from somewhere else. Such as inaccuracies in the measuring device.
But I see what you mean. In a lot of things very small numbers and very large numbers are rounded because when these numbers are applied more exact numbers don't make a large difference.
Also, irrational numbers. Nuff said.

But, in some fields, like when you're dealing with chaotic things, tiny changes and infintesimal changes in rounding caqn completely screw up later calculations.

2007-01-08 23:32:17 · answer #2 · answered by Click 2 · 0 0

sig-figs don't have any excess, unnecessary numbers and show exactly how accurate one measured something...

2007-01-08 23:26:22 · answer #3 · answered by Ninja 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers