It means they'll be the only undefeated team.
Of course, I could think of at least 6 other teams that would have gone undefeated with that schedule, namely Florida, Ohio State, USC, Duke, Thiel, and Central Upper Nebraska Tech.
2007-01-08 15:14:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Being that Boise State plays in a mediocre conference (WAC) and had a very mediocre non-conference schedule (Oregon State, Wyoming, Utah and 1-AA Sacramento State), I don't think under the current system that they would ever be considered national champions. Most of the teams in the BCS would be undefeated as well if they got to play the schedule Boise did.
Boise played only 5 teams that made it to a bowl game (Oregon State, Hawaii, Utah, San Jose State and Nevada), which isn't exactly a murderer's row. "Good" teams, yeah, but the only "great" team Boise beat all year was Oklahoma. And even though I like to pimp the WAC as much as possible (Nevada is my alma mater), realistically, the WAC is not going to win a football title in the BCS era unless Boise was to go 12-0 AND every other school had at least two losses (which isn't likely to happen).
However, if there was a playoff in place, where conference winners were seeded like they do with the NCAA basketball tournament, then I think Boise would have as good a chance as any team to win the tournament.
to TheOnlyBeldin - I doubt Duke would have won more than two or three games in the WAC. While there are a few horrible teams (Louisiana Tech, New Mexico State, Utah State) and a couple below-average ones (Fresno State, Idaho), at the top it's not bad. San Jose State and Hawaii both won their bowl games, and Nevada almost beat five-time champion Miami. Just because a team (like Duke) is horrible in a BCS conference doesn't mean they'll do any better in a non-BCS conference.
2007-01-08 15:35:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by caysdaddy04 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It means that Boise State beat a bunch a weak WAC teams and got a close win over oklanhoma and deserves to be ranked #4 under Florida Ohio and USC
2007-01-08 15:14:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by lilcurly 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
It means that in several instances, the Big Ten SUCKS and that Boise State should be a top 5 team.
2007-01-09 05:52:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by bigvol662004 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Last I checked, being undefeated after playing in a division full of Division III teams doesn't make you the National Champions. Winning the BCS National Championship means you're the national champions.
GO SEC AND GO LSU.
2007-01-08 15:16:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jukeboxster 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
bypass huge Ten (for as quickly as) and Michael are authentic. at the same time as, i could have enjoyed to have seen TCU and Boise play different communities (screwing them over enjoying one yet another), they with the aid of no means are from now on than a coachless Cincy. Thats under no circumstances honest....... Whats additionally not honest- enjoying on a rattling blue terf, hows that honest to different communities. enjoying interior the wac on a blue field isnt precisely displaying something better than what cincy did. heavily, everybody probable could have lost to Florida enjoying 8 hours from homestead interior the south, with Tebows final recreation.
2016-10-30 09:47:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by deliberato 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gators = National Champions
2007-01-08 15:21:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by mkjhfiuy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It means they'll be ranked around #4 or 5 in the final media and coaches top 25 polls
2007-01-08 17:01:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It means Florida is the National Champion and Bosie St isn't.
Did you see their schedule? They may as well have been playing blind schools. It was that weak.
2007-01-08 15:36:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hm.......yeah who have they beaten? San Jose State, Hawaii, Idaho? Yeah real juggernauts of the gridiron there. I'll give them the Oklahoma win but they haven't played anybody.
2007-01-08 15:21:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by mxpowertbl 3
·
2⤊
0⤋