fine, fly, hot, cute, okay. When I see a attractive looking person i just consider them good looking not any of these stupid labels. Ps gorgeous buetiful. Whats with this world?
2007-01-08 14:02:19 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Not sure.
You mean to say theres nothing else but "good looking" or maybe beautiful?
idk
You can have some good looking person but not really feel physically attracted. Or some beautiful decoration or something.
But if you also wish to mention that someone is good looking plus you feel physically attracted... maybe saying "hot looking" instead of just "good looking" would be ok.
2007-01-08 14:14:30 · answer #1 · answered by ganja_claus 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's true, but in my opinion, they represent different things. 'Cute', to me, has a different connotation than 'hot', and I save 'okay' for people who rank lower on my scale of attractiveness. Even 'fine' and 'fly' have slightly different meanings, though I never use them. 'Gorgeous' and 'beautiful' are on the same level, but I'd use them differently than I would 'hot' or 'cute'. So I don't think they're stupid- I think they express different concepts, and I like them. There are different levels of attractiveness (beauty being in the eye of the beholder, of course), and the words address them, in my opinion.
2007-01-08 14:11:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I find them to be stupid as well, but many people like these labels and will keep using them no matter how meaningless they are.
2007-01-08 14:07:14 · answer #3 · answered by jordanred17_89 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm cute lol thats the label i like i dont like being called pretty or hot or beautiful i like cute makes me sound cuddly
:)
2007-01-08 14:06:54 · answer #4 · answered by HI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Deplorable education. Complete lack of language skills.
2007-01-08 14:26:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES...I think labels are stupid. Why do people use them i'll never know. I am me. You are you. Why change that?
2007-01-08 14:46:12 · answer #6 · answered by cripesokay2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if I were to answer "What's wrong with the world" this would be fiffty pages long. But, yeah, I've kinda thought that those things were dumb as well. But people will do as they please, and there's no stoping that.
p.s. you mean beautiful?
2007-01-08 14:10:12 · answer #7 · answered by bigheadrossman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Slang has been apart of our culture for years... Next decade they will change to the new slang words...
2007-01-08 14:21:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, 'buetiful' is better.
2007-01-08 14:07:58 · answer #9 · answered by Kedar 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bad spelling?
2007-01-08 14:05:57 · answer #10 · answered by DEATH 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋