"Despite the difficulty in giving a common meaning to "justice" it remains the predominant purpose of the law"?
2007-01-08 13:39:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
This means that it's hard to say exactly what we mean by the word "justice", but still, as hard as it is to define it, it is the main purpose for having law - to try and have justice.
2007-01-08 13:43:31 · answer #1 · answered by All hat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Justice has many interpretations and applications but it is still the ultimate goal of the law.
2007-01-08 13:44:59 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It means that although it is difficult to define justice- the purpose of law is to ensure justice.
2007-01-08 13:43:40 · answer #3 · answered by Jen 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is no "justice" only a philosophical perspective on its fairness and application according to the victim, perpetrator and our society as a whole.
2007-01-08 13:44:09 · answer #4 · answered by Greed...Is Good 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It means it shard to say what "Justice" is, but it still is the one thing the law is there for.
2007-01-08 13:44:41 · answer #5 · answered by cantstoplovenyou 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's your question? It says the the concept of justice is a subjective one.
2007-01-08 13:44:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The time era "basic regulation" refers to a device of regulation that derives from judicial judgements, somewhat than statutes and/or constitutions -- rules that come from the judicial branch of government somewhat than the legislative branch.
2016-12-15 19:14:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is the definition of "legal mumbo jumbo".
2007-01-08 13:45:39 · answer #8 · answered by Kokopelli 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋