English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I feel they are the same black pathers held there fists up and yelled black power. White supremacists do the same but with their hand open yelling white power. Both groups are for their own race to be united as one to fight against the other races. Am i Wrong? If so
explain the difference.

2007-01-08 13:06:16 · 12 answers · asked by Travis W 2 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

12 answers

nothing there both flip sides of the same racist coin. black panthers may have a legitimate grievances, but there methodology and tactics leave a lot to be desired, also don't forget that the bloods and crips gangs owe much of there existence to the black panthers, not necessarily directly but by proxy.

white supremacist ((sheesh dint make me laugh)) as big a collection fo jokes and trash as have ever wasted the oxygen on this planet. I find stupidity humorous and these guys are a laugh riot. or at least they would be if they werent so ubiqitous, and damned determined to start a race war thatll leave civilization in flames.


Just remeber one simple fact of life that everyone blacka nd white seems to conveniently forget.

WE ARE ALL ONE RACE (human) we are not different species, we all have the same organs, the same blood, the same nerves, brains, skin etc.

the only variations are caused by ecological changes, europeans gained lighter skin by virtue of living in areas where temperatures were less temperate.

****** gained black skin due to lving in areas where sunlight and hot temperatures were the norm.

in essence both groups are to simplify full of complete morons that ignore the most basic and simple rule of humanity the golden one.

do unto others as you would ahve done unto you.

2007-01-08 13:21:16 · answer #1 · answered by catsi563 3 · 0 1

Hillary also supported the Black Panther. She took section in some black panther thingwhen she become in college. As for the racism, the most racist ingredient I heard got here from a Democrat. He stated he received't vote for a Republican, because tehy stole land from the whites after the civil warfare and gave it to the black. Peple forgot, that when the Civil warfare the Southerners joined the Democratic social gathering. the concern is a few of those Soutehrn Democrats jumped deliver lately and Joined the Republicans. the numerous Neocons are Southern Democrats who switched events. basically because teh Black Panther become created to wrestle racism does no longer cause them to no longer racist. Our highway gangs were created to wrestle racism besides. Frankly Slavery become created out of the caste device from Europe. THeir low esteem help generate a caste device right here contained in the U. S., that ended as a lot as be slavery. we could continuously no longer excuse slavery basically because the slave vendors journey abuse.

2016-12-28 11:55:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Black Panthers started as a racist organization, but as they speed across the country, the diversity of their membership ended the racist concepts and they worked with other fringe groups to improve the quality of life in needy communities. The prime reason the Black Panthers were considered a fringe organization, is because they believed in armed resistance and saw police as the visible arm of those that perpetuated poverty and violence against the powerless. All police killings of Black Panthers were found to be wrongful deaths. White supremacist bomb churches with children drag humans to death and believe that all other ethnic groups are sub-human. In Europe, they attempted genocide of the Jews and practiced ethnic cleansing in the Serbian states.

White supremacist took a group that was founded to aid the windows and orphans of the southern civil war and turned it into to epitome of hatred and bigotry. Black Panthers turned a group founded on racism into social activist. So if we compare them, let us call the Black Panthers (poison ivy) which is an irritant to many humans, and let us call white supremacist (fox glove), which is fatal to humans.

2007-01-08 14:33:37 · answer #3 · answered by Charles 1 · 1 2

I don't know the specifics, but there is one major difference you might be missing.

The Black Panthers were fighting for a race that was truly oppressed. White supremacists only think they are.

2007-01-08 13:10:26 · answer #4 · answered by DonSoze 5 · 3 1

White Supremacists are the Forefathers of this country.

White Supremacists are the ones who set up the concept of "Race".

White Supremacists are the reason that White People control the United States of America, Australia, South Africa...

White Supremacists are responsible for genocides that would make Darfur look like a regular lynching. (Can you say Tasmania?).

I can go on forever about White Supremacy.

What can you say about the BLACK PANTHER PARTY???

2007-01-08 13:35:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

The Black Panthers are a militant hate group yet play the race card when any white has any sense of pride.

2007-01-08 13:14:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

I Always thought black panthers weren't against white people, they just wanted equality between both races.

2007-01-08 13:10:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

From the answers I see here and from what I have read; the only difference is the press they receive.

2007-01-08 13:38:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

the Panthers use(d) GUNS. Really, REALLY big GUNS. Hell, what's burning a cross gonna do? But, indeed, you are correct.

2007-01-08 13:32:57 · answer #9 · answered by Iseult 3 · 2 4

Difference? Only skin color.

2007-01-08 13:13:24 · answer #10 · answered by robfucious 2 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers