(More feminism causing breast cancer) : Does one care more about a rodent's butt or a lemming's breasts?

Question

Seeing as my evidence of temporal causal relation of breast cancer by an increase since feminisms inception, and a spatial causal relation of focus on a career instead of having children before 30 which feminism promotes..

Thus meaning feminism causes breast cancer.

Could not be logically refuted on here, I thought I'd add this:

HOUSEWORK CUTS BREAST CANCER RISK
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2522050,00.html
[ Hot picture in the top one. ]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6214655.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/12/29/nhsewk29.xml

Basically feminists are suicidal, is that it? Are you all just lemmings trying to run off that cliff thinking the open space is freedom?

I must ask then, if asked to underwrite such irresponsible behaviour:

Does one care more about a rodent's butt or a lemming's breasts?

Rebel F:

1. Breast cancer risk is increased by no children before 30 & no housework.
2. Feminism promotes no children before 30 & no housework.
3. Feminism causes breast cancer.

It's a completely logical syllogism. The only way it could be faulted is if I was saying there were no other causes, but I'm not. There are other causes, it's just that feminism is behind a 50-81% rise.

And you're not men's equal if you do silly, suicidal things are you? You will be mocked. For good reason. At any rate no surprises here, but with a prevention program well at hand, feminists and the women who listen to them can pay for their own prevention programs and treatment.

Answer 1

Better yet, Minerva, if he even tried to write, say, a college Sociology 101 term paper using this kind of logic and supporting evidence, he wouldn't even get a "D." Then he asks his "answerers" to "prove" that his logic is faulty (as if the burden of proof lay with them). Which reminds me of an experience I had with a college roommate, who, it turned out, was schizophrenic, (unbeknown to me). When she stopped taking her meds, and began hearing "demons" telling her to kill herself, I, not knowing any better, tried to convince her that it simply wasn't true, there were no demons. But then I realized that, in her mind, those demons were as real as I was, maybe even more so. There is no "proof" in the face of such powerful and overwhelming delusional "evidence," there was no logical argument, despite all the logical proof in the world. I did finally convince her to get the help she needed, but she never stopped believing those demons were there, they just stopped talking to her. Trying to "argue" with, or prove anything to "Happy" is just as pointless as telling my roommate those "demons" weren't there. He has already convinced himself, with nothing more than his hatred as his main "evidence," all other "evidence" he gleans is nothing more than proof that his hatred is "valid." and who can argue with that? A sane person would go insane trying.

Answer 2

Feminism does not promote no children before 30, or dont do housework.

Many feminists have children before 30. Some dont have a choice in this day and age. Many women need to work.

Secondly, most of us still do the housework. Some of us are just lucky enough to have a decent man around who will give us a hand sometimes. Obviously you are not one of those decent men.

It is amazing what your silly little immature ridiculous mind comes up with. If you were to write these things up as a book or essay, it would be ridiculed - not for your beliefs but because you ignore all other evidence and only concentrate on the evidence that suits your own sick agenda.

Answer 3

Your assertion that feminism causes breast cancer doesn't NEED to be logically refuted, since your claim is highly illogical in the first place, and is very stereotypical. You don't understand logic, you can't just make such ridiculous connections like that.

Basically what you're doing is this:

1. All cats have hair.
2. Janet has hair.
3. Therefore, Janet is a cat.

Your logic is weak and faulty, you've proven nothing and no one cares what you have to say. All you're doing is trying to push your sexist male agenda on women, asserting that we'll be less likely to DIE if we do housework, stand in the kitchen all day, accept men as our superiors, and squirt out as many babies as possible. Just give it up man. Even if that WERE true (and it certainly isn't), I'd rather have a shorter life as an equal than a long life as an inferior. Get over yourself.

Answer 4

oftentimes the reason someone does no longer have little ones in the previous the age of 30 is an monetary reason - no longer a feminist reason. 40 years in the past, no longer as many women folk necessary to enter the artwork force - now maximum individuals favor to. If i might want to have adequate money to offer up my pastime now and performance a baby i might want to, yet we can't. There are also many diverse causes of breast cancer (consisting of it being hereditary). My moms aunt were given breast cancer even although she had little ones early in life and he or she breast fed all of them. Does this advise we shouldn't care about breast cancer in each woman that receives it - or in consumer-friendly words the feminists that carry it on themselves? could funding for learn in consumer-friendly words take delivery of to those that are getting to comprehend women folk who get it because of hereditary causes? Or could we supply up funding all jointly? by way of how, I in actual reality desire your mom/sister/aunt/grandma/niece/spouse/da... by no ability receives breast cancer as they could of direction by no ability position self belief in you for help.

Answer 5

Give up, it's got to the point where there is nothing to debate as your posts are so nonsensical.

I'm not a feminist, but listening to you non stop is enough to make anyone (male or female) want to run and jump off a cliff!

Answer 6

If men are so smart, why do they wear ties? Why do men start their day by putting a noose around their neck?

Answer 7

I must care more about a rodent's butt since I actually read this to the end

Answer 8

Dear Sociopath: "Thou art a counterfeit crank, a cheater." I'm here to let the others know NOT to waste their time answering your so-called "questions". In fact, your postings are not questions at all; instead, they are the impotent rants of a profoundly disturbed and hateful CRANK and W-A-N-K

Confused yet again? Poor dearie. Knowing that you are linguistically challenged, I've included a dictionary definition for you: http://www.webster-dictionary.net/defini...

Definition of Crank
4. A twist or turn of the mind; caprice; whim; crotchet; also, a fit of temper or passion. Violent of temper; subject to sudden cranks.
5. A person full of crotchets; one given to fantastic or impracticable projects; one whose judgment is perverted in respect to a particular matter.
6. A sick person; an invalid. Thou art a counterfeit crank, a cheater.

In light of the above it's obvious why I consider you a crank: you are "one whose judgment is perverted in respect to a particular matter." The proof is in the ugliness and deceptive nature of your postings. As I have pointed out repeatedly, your sources are either mental midgets like yourself (your FELLOW CRANKS) or, you simply LIE . You make up "truth" as you go along, as it fits your warped paradigm of the world. The effortles nature of your lying is nothing short of pathological. That part (of course) make you a world-class W-A-N-K. Just for the record, here a tally of your lunatic "questions" thus far:

Why have feminists been sending death threats to (of all people) domestic violence experts? Asked by Happy Bullet - 0 answers - Women's Studies Why are men specifically excluded BY LAW from protection from domestic violence? Asked by Happy Bullet - 0 answers - Women's Studies I'm confused! Why would an all girl's school sign a petition to end women's suffrage?!? Asked by Happy Bullet - 5 answers - Women's Studies - 51 minutes ago - Open Why did 163/167 people not care about a woman beating a man in public? Asked by Happy Bullet - 16 answers - Women's Studies - 19 hours ago - Open Why do feminists INSIST that men ACCEPT domestic violence by women? Asked by Happy Bullet - 13 answers - Women's Studies - 22 hours ago - Open (More feminism causing breast cancer) : Does one care more about a rodent's butt or a lemming's breasts? Asked by Happy Bullet - 8 answers - Women's Studies - 1 day ago - Open Why, in women's 1000s of years of cooking experience, did they not invent the medicinal arts before men did? Asked by Happy Bullet - 19 answers - Women's Studies - 1 day ago - Open Why should I care about feminists whining about breast cancer when feminism causes it? Asked by Happy Bullet - 25 answers - Women's Studies - 2 days ago - Open If children were mutilated to elicit sympathy and help, would feminists consider that a crime? Asked by Happy Bullet - 14 answers - Women's Studies - 2 days ago - Open Why does the FOUNDER of the women's refuge movement say women in shelters SEEK and DISPLAY violent behavior? Asked by Happy Bullet - 9 answers - Women's Studies - 2 days ago - Open Why do feminists only whine about media portrayal of women, when 69% of media portrayal of men is negative? Asked by Happy Bullet - 7 answers - Women's Studies - 4 days ago - Resolved Why do feminists oppose paternity tests when 30% prove the man was the victim of fraud? Support of slavery? Asked by Happy Bullet - 9 answers - Women's Studies - 4 days ago - Resolved Why would N.O.W. oppose paternity tests when 30% come up negative? Support of SLAVERY as defined under US LAW? Asked by Happy Bullet - 2 answers - Law & Ethics - 4 days ago - Resolved If feminists are for equality why do they claim women's 75c to a man's dollar based on a myth? Asked by Happy Bullet - 9 answers - Women's Studies - 5 days ago - Resolved If feminists are about social justice, why are they turning men into slaves BY THE DEFINITION OF US LAW? Asked by Happy Bullet - 10 answers - Women's Studies - 5 days ago - Resolved Why do feminists think equality means undermining a fundamental concept of justice and human rights for men? Asked by Happy Bullet - 13 answers - Women's Studies - 6 days ago - Resolved If 40-60% of rape accusations are false, why don't feminists support punishment for false rape accusers? Asked by Happy Bullet - 17 answers - Women's Studies - 6 days ago - Resolved Can those who think feminism is about equality answer these questions? Asked by Happy Bullet - 16 answers - Women's Studies - 1 week ago - Resolved How do police know who to arrest in a domestic dispute involving lesbians? Asked by Happy Bullet - 18 answers - Women's Studies - 1 week ago - Resolved Which of these MGTOW logos is the best? Asked by Happy Bullet - 3 answers - Women's Studies - 1 week ago - Resolved Is affirmative action just a euphemism for forcing men to marry lazy and litigious women? Asked by Happy Bullet - 7 answers - Women's Studies - 1 week ago - Resolved Why are American women *not* in demand with foreign men, while American men *are* with foreign women? Asked by Happy Bullet - 10 answers - Women's Studies - 1 week ago - Resolved Why can't we have Sharia law? Doesn't seem so bad to me...? Asked by Happy Bullet - 8 answers - Religion & Spirituality - 1 month ago – Resolved