This person argues that mathematics and science are meaningless-fromTHERE epistemological criteria?

Question

The philosophy books on this site claim that all science all mathematics all philosophy in fact all products of human thinking and thought collapes into meaninglesness. Logic itself collapses itself into meaninglessness. Logic is not an epistemic condition for the discovery of truth as it reduces everythhing including itelf to self-contradiction or meaninglessness. Nihlism is infact meaningless even meaninglessness ends in meannglessness We are left with nothing but chaos and uncertainty . By the very tools we use to discover truth ie logic these tool lead to their own collapse into meaningles and every other prodiuct of human thinking All categotries all ethics all clasificationary systems in fact every thing collapse into meaninglessness. in terms of the very tools ie logic we hope to give meaning with . How maths and sxcience work becomes a mystery

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/gamahucher_press_catalogue.htm

Answer 1

Language itself is epitemological. Therefore, you can have only meaningless communication when all is said and done. Right?

Answer 2

So what you are saying is that a book that is meaninglessness is declaring that everything else is also meaningless.

Doesn't that impress you as being a bit of a problem? How can something that announces that IT is meaningless say anything meaningful about the rest of the world? Wouldn't its judgment about the "meaninglessness" of the rest of the world be nothing more than a reflection of its own self condemnation?

I would say that the argument is not just meaningless but down right stupid.

Meaning comes from use. The use of words, ideas, concepts, and objects are their meaning. So meaning is not some obscure, mysterious concept. The misguided nihilist who declares the world of ideas is meaningless must have a lot of trouble using a fork at supper. The poor fork being so meaningless and all. LOL.

Answer 3

Sum.