English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

One of our special forces C-130 just bombed an Al Queda safe house in Somalia, will the democrats refuse to pay for the fuel and munitions they used?

2007-01-08 11:53:36 · 12 answers · asked by THE MASTER!! 1 in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

If we are doing something good with that aircraft and it is helping us win the war...OF COURSE she will stop funding for it!
They are LOOKING for ways to speed up our loss and what better way than not to pay for the things we need to WIN!

2007-01-08 12:04:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Get real. Start with facts. The 2007 spending for Defense is $498 billion, Pelosi had nothing to do with that which was set in 2006 by the 109th. Congress. Bush has ask for another $100 billion to spend in Iraq in addition, he will not get that new spending. Part of the rules change passed in the 107th. Congress was Pay Go. For all new spending Bush must tell Congress what he will cut to get the new spending. He has never been held accountable in the past 5 years. BTW, those that know nothing about war do not understand our service men could care less about politics, it does not effect them in any way. All who serve now and have served in past know that as fact.

2007-01-08 20:09:58 · answer #2 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0 3

It is uncertain what strategy the Democrats in Congress are going to use regarding the war. I keep hearing different ideas. They want to stop the war, but they don't want to leave the troops over there high and dry. We'll all have to watch and see how it plays out.

2007-01-08 19:58:28 · answer #3 · answered by ROBERT L O 4 · 4 0

Any thing that will add up to a loss in Iraq and lowering the morale of our troops. That is what her party is working for.

2007-01-08 20:09:59 · answer #4 · answered by Bawney 6 · 3 1

Depends (and I don't mean the leakproof underwear that most of the democrats are wearing) on when you ask her. I heard a tape of Numbnuts Nancy today from 2004 where she was stating that we needed to send more troops to Iraq. Now she's flip-flopped like Hydrant-Head Kerry. She's voting against it after she voted for it. Stupid twit.

2007-01-08 19:59:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

Ahhh Pelosi is the Speaker of the House not a lobbyist for the aircraft industry.

Go big Red Go

2007-01-08 20:00:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 5

I hope not. There better not be any funds withdrawn from Iraq either. Thanks for bringing this up. I was not aware of the strike. Go USA!!!

2007-01-08 20:27:29 · answer #7 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 0 0

The real question is will George Bush through a tantrum when the Congress refuses to cash anymore of his blank checks?

http://jacksonleslie.blogspot.com

2007-01-08 19:59:47 · answer #8 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 1 5

Probably since the terrorists killed committed their bombings when Clinton the First was in office and now it makes Bill look bad that GW Bush had to do his job for him.

2007-01-08 19:58:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 4

No, the only war funds they will eloquently withdraw are those funds to be used to send more troops into Iraq.

2007-01-08 20:00:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers