English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

The difference between American and British literature has a lot to do with the ages and stages of 'greatness' characterizing both. American literature hasn't been around for as long but has a wonderful frontier attitude. There's loads of adventures and coming of age stuff and some heavy fiddling around with conventions. British lit has it's roots in medieval stuff and, obviously, in Shakespeare. It can be pretentious but more often is characterized by either satire or poetic undertones.

American lit sometimes alludes to British (especially in the reactionary sense) but British rarely alludes to American. World Lit alludes to both but rarely in a complimentary manner.

You might go on to divide World Literature into Post-Colonial and Independent literature. Post-Colonial literature from around the world are works written after British world dominance. Some speak of exploitation while others speak of influence. Independent literature from around the world is characterized by the culture from which it springs with no more weight given to colonial powers than to any other event or background information. I'm a fan of Russian literature (in translation) which is only 'World Literature' if you happen to be outside of Russia.

ciao,
Nicole

2007-01-08 11:45:41 · answer #1 · answered by Nicole L 2 · 1 0

British Literature refers to works written by British authors, just as American Literature refers to works written by American authors. World Literature is a term for all of literature and includes American and British literature, as well as works from Asia, Africa, etc.

2007-01-08 11:35:15 · answer #2 · answered by Kate 3 · 0 0

Perhaps your real question is why is there a difference between World Lit and British and American Lit? Those catagories were defined by the people who create the literary canon of which the bulk of "important" literature has historically come from Great Britain and America. There has been much effort in the last forty years to create a more inclusive canon of recognized works which is where the term and idea of world lit came from. The term World Literature excludes British and American lit.

2007-01-08 11:30:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is pretty obvious.
British Literature are books written by British authors
American Literature are books written by American authors
World Literature are books by authors all around the world

2007-01-08 11:25:47 · answer #4 · answered by Mike F 2 · 3 2

There is no difference, they all are in English. How about French literature for a difference.
Sourire.

2007-01-08 11:38:00 · answer #5 · answered by Nicolette 6 · 0 0

i'm British and that i have no project with any human beings. in reality I evaluate the U. S. to be an staggering asset to western democracies as an total.The dollar and human value protecting our values and spreading democracy the position tyranny reigned, is unrivaled by way of all eu democracies jointly. the reason the u . s . is unpopular in our u . s . as we communicate might want to be basically because of the leftist media's skewed reporting of events. quite oftentimes it really is our lesser knowledgeable human beings ,that experience a favor to belong to a fashion as adverse to comparing the problem ,that are maximum vocal. a lot of my compatriots that are quick to sentence the moves and values of the U. S.,could be careful what they desire for.i might want to particularly be Airstrip a million than Tehran 2.

2016-12-28 10:34:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers