When did you find out the Bush Administration Orchestrated the Terror Attacks of 911 ??

Question

If you don't think it is so...you haven't done your homework!

You can start here....

http://patriotsquestion911.com/
911 TRUTH.ORG
REOPEN 911.ORG
PUBLIC ACTION.COM
SERENDIPITY.LI
APFN.ORG
911 ATTACK ON AMERICA.COM
INFOWARS.COM
TRUTHMOVE.ORG
FREE PRESS INTERNATIONAL.COM
ABLE DANGER.COM
911STUFF.COM

Answer 1

I discovered the WTC Buildings were most likely taken down by professional means by use of explosives on 7-23-06. That is when I learned a BYU Physics Professor found an explosive called Thermate on a WTC scrap sample.

I discovered the Pentagon was most likely attacked by a military aircraft armed with an on board missile on 12-23-06. This is when I learned a fellow researcher discovered the identity of the jet engines found at the Pentagon crash site.

I have already shown you some of my research conducted for the WTC buildings in an earlier question / answer. Allow me to show you some of my research conducted for the Pentagon attack.

There is strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D engines do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

Answer 2

I continuously had some inkling that the tragedies that transpired on September eleventh went off too easily to be the artwork of amateurish outdoors perpetrators geared up with homestead progression utilities and with scant protection rigidity preparation, yet at that factor it become an instinctual wager. I had no longer some thing concrete to ensure my organisation. yet after I considered the documentary “loose change”, some months in the past and began to inspect a number of its claims independently, I had come to the end that the destruction of the international commerce center and the Pentagon would were the artwork of inner brokers become pretty probable.

Answer 3

To: duckkillerdan

Before you make more assumptions, learn some basic history and facts.

Most of those sites are run by traditional conservatives..ie Republicans (not the neo-con variety).

But being a raving nut crosses all party lines.

Answer 4

You know what? Anyone can set up a website saying just about anything. It doesnt have to be true. I could show you twice as many websites making a connection in between bigfoot and roswell. Does that mean its true....just because its on the net?

Answer 5

Very persuasive. Are you a Rhodes scholar? Might you be the reincarnation of Einstein?

(stupidity unbounded)

Answer 6

Do you believe in the tooth fairy, Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny as well? It appears you do believe in fantasy.

Answer 7

sept 12/2001

Answer 8

You little terrorist-helpers never give up, eh?

THOSE ARE ALL KNOWN TERRORIST WESITES.
Are you a Believer, or are you just in it for the money??????

Answer 9

i never bought into that tripe... but it was about the same time i learned that half of the american population are retards

Answer 10

Its called, "Propaganda"....... and I dont believe any of it!