Or should other cities with mild winters be allowed to hold the Super Bowl as well?
Washington, Tennessee, and Carolina have asked to host it and were turned down.
2007-01-08 10:58:37 · 7 answers · asked by Stealing Home 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
geez toughen up those players. now a days their so damn pampered they have to have the best.
these players have taken the the sport out of the game. let them play outside and if its too cold then get some players that are willing to play the sport. these players are just over grown sissy's
football is suppose to be a national sport so why does it have to be play in one area come on people share the action just like the olympics they bid on where they will be held next . i think every state should have a chance to host the Superbowl come on people get with it
2007-01-08 11:17:32 · answer #1 · answered by Leah K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it should be played in all the climates. You want to see warriors perform in the most extreme conditions. That is what makes a true super bowl champion. Just look at the patriots and Raiders game in the AFC final in 02, that snow bowl should have been the super bowl. It was awesome except for the bad call late in the game.
Peace,
2007-01-08 11:18:03 · answer #2 · answered by George 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
actual football followers might want to care a lot less about the elements. Did you ever see the followers fill Lambeau field in sixty seven to ascertain the Packers defeat the Cowboys even as it change into -13 degrees with a wind sit back making it experience like -50 degrees? football is about survival of the fittess and in no way about media leisure which they have made it out to be. I easily ought to visual demonstrate unit the Falcons play in a dome yet I desire the game to be outdoors inspite of the elements.
2016-12-02 00:41:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not!! Just like all season it should be played in any weather element, BUT it never will be. Cause by superbowl time its ALL about the $$$$$$$$ & ratings
2007-01-08 11:13:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELL no,football is a outdoor sport.Besides
natural grass is the only thing to play on,not that crap they have indoors.Chicago had that crap for a couple of years and went back to grass.
D A....B E A R S
'MONSTERS OF THE MIDWAY"
2007-01-08 12:09:51 · answer #5 · answered by pretzgolf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. the elements are part of the game and it makes it way more fun. dont you like watching football in the snow?
2007-01-08 11:04:45 · answer #6 · answered by what? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would think that players would like it outdoors in the cold so they wont be hot because hot and cold mix and make WARM
2007-01-08 11:00:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋