talking about buying big players to succeed
2007-01-08 08:33:53 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
i think these two teams are working together to bring down FCbarcelona big time
2007-01-08 08:41:00 · update #1
yeah madrid under 11`s
2007-01-08 08:36:06 · answer #1 · answered by gilz 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Chelsea just like Real Madrid, both are stongly funded by rich peoples and have unlimited budget. The only difference are Real Madrid utilised the money to collect star players who couldn't even play well together but only to sell more jerseys and drinks. While Chelsea managed their money to bring good players to strengthen their team. You can say Chelsea managed their unlimited resources away much better than Madrid.
Madrid didn't buy big players to success but to sell more jersey. I feel so sorry for the real fans, their Galacticos didn't come true at all.
2007-01-09 01:42:15 · answer #2 · answered by Ophelia a.k.a Mia 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Money wise, Chelsea and Real Madrid have abundant. Chelsea is currently more successful in recent years. Real Madrid is struggling with the "Galativo" status. Real Madid did very well previously in the Champions League, winning a few occasions. Chelsea is starting to build themselves up, and has not win any Champion League yet. So if you are comparing money sense, yes they are similar. In terms of Champion League success, Real Madrid rules.
2007-01-09 00:54:29 · answer #3 · answered by Pureskill 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Currently they are somewhat alike but Real Madrid have a very rich history. Chelsea on the other hand had won very little before money came in. I don't like either team, but I respect Real Madrid because of their history. Chelsea are scum.
2007-01-08 16:40:07 · answer #4 · answered by vavavoom14 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, Chelsea is starting to head the same way that Real did in the last few years. But the Galacticos formula of buying big stars did not really do much good for them.
2007-01-09 03:58:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since the russian muppet took over, chelsea have spent spent spent ok its nice to see the best players playing in england but it has to stop somewhere they have bought the premiship tittle two years on the bounce it getting boring now and costing clubs ln the lower leagues dear,there should be a limt put on how much a player should cost football no a game any more it all about the money thanks to chelsea !!!
Hope you dont mind can we have teddy sherringham back !!!!
2007-01-08 16:41:16 · answer #6 · answered by 007 and a half 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are similar in that they have big name, and successful internationals playing for them. But, for me, Real is like the team where all the older successful players are, whereas Chelsea seems to be the team where all the young successful hotshots are going. But yea, I agree that they are both quite similar.
2007-01-08 16:41:48 · answer #7 · answered by sweetpanther08 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are like Madrid except they do not have nearly as distinguished a past. Real love them or hate them has been a giant for a lot longer.
2007-01-08 17:52:35 · answer #8 · answered by Robert B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do they trie to buy the best players to win every champion ship they play. but i think barcelona and Sevilla have proved that u dont need a lot of good talent in ure squad to succed. for now there is no team that can bring down Barcelona.
2007-01-08 22:12:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ME! Not a bit but a lot. They spend, spend and spend. They buy good players and put them on the bench until the players lose their qualities. They both believe that money buys football and love, but bloody mistaken.
2007-01-13 17:15:12 · answer #10 · answered by Brown Girl up for an Australian 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋