What should WWE do???
1. Keep it as is with three brands: Raw, Smackdown, ECW.
2. Get rid of ECW and go back to Raw and Smackdown.
3. Merge all 3 into 1 brand and have just 1 WWE (like they did in the 90's).
I think they should just have ONE brand of wrestling. They no longer have the talent for more brands. RAW would be the main show and Smackdown would be the follow up show like it used to be in the 90's.
However, if they decide to have RAW and Smackdown brands and keep them apart, it is a MUST that WWE puts an end to ECW. ECW has been nothing but a failure!!! It's nothing like the original. It's like bringing back WCW with Disco Inferno, Steve McMichael, Horace Hogan, and then filling in the rest with current WWE superstars.
So I choose option #3, if not #2.
2007-01-08 07:58:21 · 9 answers · asked by bdaly08 2 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
1 show, 2 at the most.
This isnt 2001, they dont have enough people for 3 shows. Theres only about 8 legit main event superstars left in the entire company. And half of these people dont deserve to be on tv. Tatanka? Boogeyman? Matt Stryker? if the rosters weren't bare half of that company would be out of work right now.
2007-01-08 08:02:37 · answer #1 · answered by anonymous w 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should combine Raw and Smackdown. They should stop using ECW wrestlers on Raw or Smackdown and stop putting Raw and Smackdown wrestlers on ECW. And they should start a new show, WCW!!
It would be WWE- Raw and Smackdown combined, with One Champion for both shows.
ECW on Sci-Fi- More ECW rules macthes
And They should start a new WCW show from scratch with all new Wrestlers and maybe 2 or 3 Veterans like Benoit, Booker-T and Rey Mysterio.
Anyways, it'll probably never happen because Vince is the most Uncreative Son Of A ***** in Pro-Wrestling.
2007-01-08 16:08:29 · answer #2 · answered by j.soto416 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wo hold on. think about it for a minute, because of three brands, there is wrestling on 3 times a week. (not counting tna)
but if they have one big show, what will wrestling fans do for the rest of the times. one big brand will also give a less chance for wrestlers to wrestle.
ex. there is a big feud that there is a match for it every week. how will less important but still valued wrestlers like london and kendrick or sabu wrestle? because of 3 diffent brands, people have a better chance of wrestling more offten. just remember, fans look foward to wrestling, but if we can only watch once a week, how else will we spend nights?
2007-01-08 16:05:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they should go back to raw and smackdown but i also think they should adopt tna because voodoo kin mafia has been hatin on mr. mcmahon and dx and ecw has gone really downhill after a crappy december to dismember. it's nothing like the original. it would be just like the battle for more ratings, wwf vs. wcw
2007-01-08 16:15:05 · answer #4 · answered by WizAW3S0ME 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
omg i never thought of number 3 but that would be a great idea even though all the guys wouldnt be able to wrestle or make the time longer
2007-01-08 16:16:03 · answer #5 · answered by IVERSON'S #1 FAN 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish that there was just one company,but there are way too many wrestlers now to be able to have them all in one place and have the time for all their story lines!
2007-01-08 16:00:58 · answer #6 · answered by molliehollie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it should just be raw and smackdown and cut the stupid gimmicks already.
2007-01-08 16:00:53 · answer #7 · answered by Mike 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that they should combine them all into one company and call it the "Actors Guild for Sports Losers" or "Soap Operas for Wanna Be Athletes" !!!
It's all a bunch of fake garbage with a soap opera theme running thru it to hold it together, because it sure doesn't have any real athletes to do it.
2007-01-08 16:14:01 · answer #8 · answered by Goyo 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
One big overall show with all the superstars.
2007-01-08 23:41:50 · answer #9 · answered by Akon605 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋