English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Not without vespa!

2007-01-08 07:21:47 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

6 answers

Yes ... but good luck containing it! We have reproduced a stars reaction on earth. It is commonly known as the Hydrogen Bomb. A star is nothing more than an immense fusion reaction combining hydrogen atoms to form helium.

2007-01-08 07:25:21 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin S 2 · 0 0

A star is a little bit more than a fusion reactor. First of all it must have strong gravity to fuse and this means size. To really create a star you'd have to have a lab several times larger than Jupiter. Difficult for sure.

2007-01-09 08:45:40 · answer #2 · answered by y2ceasar 2 · 0 0

I think "stars" will likely work in the "lab" (i.e. fusion reactors) in the future. So far, we've only been able to contain fusion reactions for a very short time by experimental means. They work, but only for a very short time. :)

ITER is an example of an experimental fusion reactor.

2007-01-08 20:31:01 · answer #3 · answered by Jonas Nordlund 2 · 0 0

Don't they already? Aren't fusion reactors a kind of "star" (at least in micro-physical terms)?

2007-01-08 15:24:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the reactors we have right now are fision reactors, not fusion. Hopefully fusion technology is right around the corner.

2007-01-08 15:28:06 · answer #5 · answered by llloki00001 5 · 0 0

You mean, will Tom Cruse or Angelia Jolie ever work for the pharmaceutical industry? I doubt it.

2007-01-08 15:30:46 · answer #6 · answered by Randy G 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers