Hells F'ing No!!
2007-01-08 05:11:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by rdbn7734 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hilary Clinton doesn’’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader ““war”” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment, and there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the quagmire that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the ““War on Terrorism”” more effectively, and away from this cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be a stellar policy maker on the domestic front, but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy.
2007-01-08 05:40:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Look, I am a Hillary hater but she way more qualified than Barrack Obama as far as experience. I tire of each side going out and characterizing our elected representatives as stupid just b/c we don't agree with their politics. Resorting to the same tactics as the rageful Bush haters isn't too smart. I know that whoever is elected in '08, if it is Hillary or anyone else, I will never have a bumper sticker that says - "(S)he's not MY president". How foolish! People hate Bush to the point that they route against him and anything he does rather than hoping for the best from him as the leader of the country in which they live.
2007-01-08 05:22:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Whootziedude 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't see the relevancy of the breast feeding anecodote. After all the current president is a grown man and he can't even eat a pretzel without inhaling it and nearly choking to death.
That said, I am one "liberal" who has his doubts about Hillary. Don't assume we are all pro-Hillary. I don't trust her 100%. I get the sense that she just tells people what they want to hear. I'd need to know alot more about her and where she stands before I'd even consider voting for her.
2007-01-08 05:13:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes, but NOT my fav candidate. (Could this possibly be to divert from the obvious brain deficiencies of Dictator Dumbya?)
2007-01-08 05:34:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes she is qualified based on being a natural born citizen and requirement of age.
2007-01-08 05:14:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yes I think she is intelligent enough. Thanks for the visual image of anyone breast-feeding off Hillary. : (
abc
2007-01-08 05:16:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bill G 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Qualified and intelligent enough, yes. Electable,no.
2007-01-08 05:17:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jedi 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
shes a fast learner so why not,especially if she tries to breast feed me
2007-01-08 05:18:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lionel M 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Your kidding right? Bush had troubles with a PRETZEL, cocaine, and drunk driving! And you doubt Hilary's intelligence?
2007-01-08 05:16:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋