2007-01-08 05:04:55 · 16 answers · asked by tardis1977 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Jimmy Carter was not effective as President. However, the Camp David Accords reached between Israel and Egypt could have been a great first step forward in Middle East peace if Ron Reagan hadn't shifted course. Even with all of the mistakes that came after the Carter years, Egypt and Israel continue to be at peace, a fact that many don't like to discuss because it doesn't match their agenda (after all, everyone knows that facts have a liberal bias).
2007-01-08 05:08:00 · answer #1 · answered by Johnny K 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The worst is user-friendly. Already, sixty six% of historians polled say G.W. Bush is the worst in U.S. historic previous and that i could no longer agree extra. the terrific? ... properly, in my view, my existence replaced into on the main wealthy point under the Clinton administration. He balanced the funds and client self assurance skyrocketed. i replaced right into a small company proprietor and my sales went in the process the roof. I wasn't alive for FDR yet f/ what I even have examine, he and Lincoln are the two terrific all time. Oh, and Nixon can relax easy now that "W" has redefined incompetence in direction of the main mandatory activity in the international. no person will ever outdo the present President because it pertains to failure. He did no longer make one best selection. those consequences are compounded by potential of the good suspicion that he acted upon his very own terrific interest.
2016-11-27 20:03:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alternative energy initiatives, peace in the Middle East. He's also done a lot of Habitat for Humanity work and has also taken the Nobel Peace Prize.
The current occupant of the White House could learn a thing or two from the peanut farmer from Georgia.
2007-01-08 05:09:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I use to put Carter up there as the worst President in US history but Bush (as hard as I thought it would be for anyone to be as bad as Carter) has easily taken over the spot as the Worst President in US history and he's not even done yet.
2007-01-08 05:09:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
leogirl, i'm sure carter is so demolished and full of guilt for not supplying those iranian terrorists with weapons to use onAmericans, as Reagan did to let those hostages go, don't you?
as far as carter is concerned, no he wasn't the best President we ever had, and he did do more than F the country up, so he definitely wasn't the worst.
2007-01-08 05:54:40 · answer #5 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, he pretty much f-ed up the country. People that say Bush is the worst President ever have a very short memory.
Carter was the most ineffective, totally worthless President since James Buchanan.
2007-01-08 05:10:46 · answer #6 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Carter got Israel and Egypt together and made peace between them. Otherwise he did nothing.
2007-01-08 17:23:08 · answer #7 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just F-ed up the country as he still is trying to now
Worst President ever
2007-01-08 05:11:06 · answer #8 · answered by bob b 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Jimmy Carter was okay--it was his brother, Billy, who screwed some things up--big time!
2007-01-08 05:07:52 · answer #9 · answered by Holiday Magic 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well when he left the white house the deficit stood at
1980:60,000,000,000
2007:830,000,000,000,000
Clinton Balanced the budget for the most part of the 90's. So at least he didnt spend money like the GOP
2007-01-08 05:18:38 · answer #10 · answered by gdeach 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋