Let's see now, he killed hundreds vs. his one death, yeah it is fair alright.
2007-01-08 05:04:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by kekeke 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is little doubt in my ideas Saddam Hussein replaced right into a bloody tyrant and that he deserved to be delivered to justice for his crimes. even nevertheless, the selection to objective him by potential of an Iraqi courtroom jointly as the conflict replaced into ongoing instruments an fairly undesirable precedent. in case you desire to instill values of democracy, justice, transparency, due technique, and so on..., and so on..., that may no longer the thank you to do this. It smacks of the varieties of regimes South people got here to loathe and loathe. yet of direction, the Bush administration purely pretends to care approximately democratic values, merely like it lied approximately each and every thing else. If the assumption replaced into to make certain fairness, justice and the international rule of regulation, Saddam Hussein could have been surpassed over to the international Human Rights Tribunal in Brussels. There could have been little doubt of the legitimacy of the lawsuits there. we've a theory in properly-ordinary democracies that proclaims it rather is not merely conflicts of pastimes which will desire to be prevented, however the visual attraction of conflicts of interest besides. That is going double for democracies that are no longer yet ordinary.
2016-11-27 20:01:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by krausz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I didn't think it was fair, I know he killed a lot of people and he was one of the worst criminals, I still somehow don't approve of his killing, specially, the manner in which he was executed, they should have shown more respect, besides wha purpose does it serve, if anything it is only going to give muslim extremists another example of how the whole world wrongs muslims, useless executions, which comes at a very wrong time.
2007-01-08 05:05:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by virgodoll 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't agree with the death penalty full stop. No one has the right to control other people's life, whose right is it to say who lives and who dies? That makes those that killed him no better then Hussein himself. Prisons need to be made a lot harsher and the death penalty abandoned
2007-01-08 05:09:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe he had a fair trial. Because the execution took place in a land who is governed by different laws, I cannot tell you whether or not the execution was fair.
2007-01-08 05:21:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by CAITLIN 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I actually would say NO if it was just an ordanary person who commited killing for one person or so...I don't really agree with the death penalty eighter, but in this case...YES he well desrved it!
This man did so much to innocent people, he should of been killed sooooooo long ago!
2007-01-08 05:15:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Just Me and My Baby 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
who cares, he's long gone by now, besides was Saddam Hussein fair when he killed all these kurds and irakis
2007-01-08 05:10:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ywa at some point some one needed to kill him but what i dont get is how come htat ussama binladden is still alive he should have been killed or died before saddam i hate pres.bush
2007-01-08 05:03:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
think... we talk about hitler and all those evil people and we will be talkin bout saddam in a few years.
2007-01-08 05:06:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sammy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it was fair, he stood trial, was sentenced, then executed, he was treated 100% better than he ever treated anyone else.
2007-01-08 05:05:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋