No, because they would die thinking I was a liar.
2007-01-08 04:52:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
NO simply because that would be a waste of their time that could be used in finding a real cure. and a waste of money that could be used to help them find a real cure.
I would scacrifice it if the cure was real though, no problem. I can always make more money, I can't replace a loved one.
2007-01-08 12:54:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Penny Mae 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well if I knew for a fact that it was a lie, then no. I would have to use some common sense here. That would just be throwing money away. And I would hope that my loved one would find it in their heart to forgive me and to come to there senses as well.
2007-01-08 12:54:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Thumper 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. I would try to get through to my loved one that the cure was fake and try to find some other way to help my loved one get well.
2007-01-08 12:54:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by loofahcat2 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope, I don't participate in illusions, especially if it sacrifices a big portion of reality.
2007-01-08 13:03:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by KatGuy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What life long savings? I have a teenager at home and twin grand daughters, whom I love to spoil. There is never any savings.
2007-01-08 12:53:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'd dump my life savings for
20 minutes with Johnny Depp and a bottle of chocolate sauce.
2007-01-08 12:53:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jenster*is*flipping*you*off 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, not if it was a lie. I would have to talk my loved one into knowing it.
2007-01-08 12:55:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by eeyoree rocks2003 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No because I would know better for my loved one and I wouldn't want him/her to suffer.
2007-01-08 12:52:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by chrstnwrtr 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it would be better to kill them, and stop their suffering, then spend the insurance money on beer and fast women
2007-01-08 12:53:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Boston Bluefish 6
·
0⤊
1⤋