2007-01-08 04:25:33 · 14 answers · asked by Terra054 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not of the US, no way. She would, however, make a good successor to Fidel Castro. They are soulmates, except that Fidel is a little more soft-hearted than Hillary. I can just see her in that uniform, ordering the imprisonment and execution of the people seeking freedom and liberty and truth.
She would be wrong for the US. She's corrupt.
2007-01-08 04:35:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I’m not sure if she would make a good President or not. What I do know is that the only thing she has done well in the Senate is criticize Bush, and being a Sophomore Senator (with no other experience) is hardly an impressive resume for a President.
The only things she seems to have is name recognition and an ex-President husband. The fact her husband was President means nothing. For example, my wife is good at mudding drywall. I have worked on most aspects of building a house, but I suck at mudding drywall and I probably always will. The fact my wife is good at it has no bearing on how well I do drywall. She can show me, she can teach me, but I still suck. My point is that just because one spouse is good at something doesn’t mean the other will be.
What my fear is is that People will vote for an unqualified person like Hillary to invoke change after 8 years of death and destruction under Bush. As far as I am concerned, the Dems or Repubs haven’t put up a Presidential candidate worth voting for in years. I waste my vote on the Libertarians. The LP will probably never win, but I figure it is time to let a different party screw up the country.
2007-01-12 12:15:27 · answer #2 · answered by Slider728 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No she would not. Her house is in shambles. She is self obsessed and does not care for anyone nor does she represent anyone but herself. Let us think back 5 years ago to 9/11. She came down only after a few days after the event happened to bash Bush. Where was the senator for NY during the attack? Did her royal highness come off of her high horse and vow to fight? nope.
I don't want her to run my country period.
2007-01-08 12:38:51 · answer #3 · answered by rdbn7734 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Probably not only because she is a radical and the last thing the US needs is another radical (from either party) becoming the next President. We need a moderate to bring the country back together after the most radical President if history (Bush) divided it almost beyond repair.
2007-01-08 12:29:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Probably a better one than her husband was, but still not good enough for me to vote for her. I still don't trust her.
2007-01-08 12:27:59 · answer #5 · answered by Sartoris 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, and apparently others feel the same way as well.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/1/11/105131.shtml?s=icp
2007-01-11 11:12:42 · answer #6 · answered by Dr. Quest 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she could easily live up to "good" in the job, but she is not my preference.
2007-01-08 12:29:49 · answer #7 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm a Democrat,she's not my first choice,but ANYONE would be an improvement over what we've got now.
2007-01-08 12:28:05 · answer #8 · answered by festeringhump 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
She couldn't keep her house and family in order... so NO.
2007-01-08 12:31:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
About as good of one as Oprah... so no.
2007-01-08 12:27:16 · answer #10 · answered by Josh 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋