Not sure-but like most slow burners they tend to be hot for longer!!
2007-01-08 04:12:45 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
their first cd was excellent - a lot of catchy tunes but they messed with brandon flowers' voice a lot. theirs less of it for the second cd which in my opinion is very different. i love both but the second one seems like an awesome follow up.
2007-01-08 04:25:14 · answer #1 · answered by ALcheMist11 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like both equally. What I am happy about is that they simply didn't make a Hot Fuss 2. the new one still has The Killers sound but different arrangements.
Unfortunately when you have a huge success as their first one was the next one is put under the microscope more and critiqued more.
2007-01-08 04:23:46 · answer #2 · answered by UpNorth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, Zaphod it's Jeltz here. (Working under an alias as Vogons don't seem to be trusted in this galaxy anymore).
Killers first is better on first hearing, but just wait...
2007-01-08 04:22:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the second is way better bling(confession of a king) is the best song they have ever done and the bonus song'take me to the place where the white boys dance' is brilliant
2007-01-08 04:21:16 · answer #4 · answered by QPRfan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I liked the first better.
2007-01-08 04:14:21 · answer #5 · answered by Kam 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1st much better in my opinion
2007-01-08 04:13:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1st is better
2007-01-08 04:56:51 · answer #7 · answered by dream theatre 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋