how would you answer this question should bush be impeached?

Question

bush should be impeached for slanting the reports on weapons of mass destruction and also violating the unlawfull search and seizure ammendment..the man must be impeached ..mabe he should have oral sex from a secretary then the repubs may agree on impeachment - lol i doubt if any sec would do it lol

Answer 1

He would just resign like Nixon did before it happened, then Cheney would give him a Presidential Pardon, just like Ford did for Nixon. Unless you could get them both at the same time it wouldn't work. Even then they would just name some replacement who would give them BOTH a pardon. Agnew resigned when Nixon was President, then Ford was named and approved by the House's.

The same thing would happen today......... so why waste the money, time and effort? Maybe we will get lucky and the two of them will go hunting together or eat pretzels.

Answer 2

Like I always do... by feeling it necessary to once again indicate just how stupid this question is, and how dense the asker must be.

1. He did not lie about WMD. All the intelligence communities of the world believed Saddam had WMD and that his labs were still operating. How can Bush be lying if the experts all say that the WMD are there?

2. As for violations of illegal search and seizure, this is an unfounded accusation. The wiretapping by NSA was specifically for when a foreign phone number "of interest" (i.e. a number found during searches of terrorists' effects) called into a US number. Since you don't seem to know this, you do not have a right to engage in secret communications with our enemies during a war.

As for the mail warrantless search that was recently moaned about, that has always been a part of law enforcement - in exigent circumstances, a warrant is unnecessary.

3. As for having adulterous sex, Clinton was not impeached for that. He was impeached for lying about it under oath, during his trial for sexual harassment of another woman.

I know it's a waste of time trying to talk sense to closed mind leftists like you, but I try anyway, hoping that one day you'll choose to embrace reality.

Answer 3

You libs are SO unimaginative.

1) If you seek to impeach Bush for "lies" relating to WMDs, you should also seek to prosecute Bill Clinton for lying when he bombed Iraq in 1998 citing the threat of its WMD programs.

2) We DID find evidence of WMDs, about 500 cannisters worth of chemical weapons. Even if we had not, that proves SQUAT. Are you really so stupid that you think Saddam wouldn't have been smart enough to hide WMDs during his decad and a half-long defiance of the world?! Talk to Syria!

3)Unlawful search and seizure? DEBUNKED! Read the exact wording of the forth ammendment of the United States Constitution. It declares that exceptions may be made in cases of rebellion or invasion, or when the public safety may demand it. I don't know about you, but I think we were invaded on 9/11/01.

4)Bill Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, not for having a BJ. Even if this was not the case, his actions spoke of the character of the man we entrusted to run this country.

5) You do not have the votes necessary in either the house OR the senate to impeach

6) Even if Bush WAS successfully impeached, Dick Cheney would take over and complete the term.

Answer 4

Katrina - do somewhat learn and also you may locate for the duration of LBJ's time there turned right into a plan handed by way of Congress to have floodgates positioned on Lake Ponchatrain to face up to a Cat 5 hurricane. locate out what happened to them and who killed them? 9/11 - What about 9/11. you suspect he ordered it? Iraq warfare - Did you want Saddam Hussein? Or are you in consumer-friendly words mad because you theory the completed ingredient might want to be hassle-free. unlawful Wiretapping- i am going to offer authorities carte blanche to reveal screen my calls if it would want to help you positioned an end to terrorists. What are you afraid they are going to learn about you? Pensions- What has Bush carried accessible? He hasn't replaced authorities pensions. deepest sector pensions he doen't administration. Jobs- you pick more effective authorities jobs? those issues value you more effective in taxes. Civilian jobs are literally not, I repeat, are literally not a function of the authorities. it really is a civilian ingredient. What do you pick Bush to do? monetary device- the basically accurate time I regarded it become doing nicely. did you comprehend sonething i do not? Iran- Bush has carried out besides as some thing of the international at getting Iran to act. Do you extremely imagine a Democrat might want to do more effective useful? Oil- damn -- you keep bringing up issues the authorities doesn't do. Opps there is ANWR. nicely he's tried to get it opened. Democrats nonetheless block it. Are you bitching about the fee? Bush doen't set that. market does. Engergy expenses- the authorities does no longer and can't administration the fee of skill. Who gave you the idea they did? The record is going on and on- And authorities doesn't have a lot to do with any of the things you whinge about. HILLLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT 08!! - i'm an ABC human being myself. all of us yet Clinton. ok perchance i might want to take Hillary over Dennis Kucinich.

Answer 5

I thought this was a serious question til i read the second part which i find offensive.but to answer the first part i was just thinking that if Clinton could be impeached for what he did then why isn't this guy Bush being investigated?He lied to get us into a war that should have been finished when the first Bush was in charge.And the other thing's you stated too.What has happened to our freedom that was gauranteed by the constitution he swore to uphold and defend?

Answer 6

The bill of impeachment must pass the House of Representatives. The best chance of approval is to investigate the management incompetence in the Executive Branch, citing specific examples of corruption at the highest levels of government. Gross waste in Federal spending and loss of life is another area where mismanagement can be proven.

It is not easy to have the House approve a bill of impeachment, so it's best to stick with specific data points in the indictment!

Answer 7

Should be? Sure. He has intentionally and willfully violated US and international laws (which are binding as US laws when we ratify the treaties).

The corruption by connected corporations, allowed under biased "no bid" procedures, sweeping powers claimed that are not allowed, circumvention of agency neutrality for political agenda... these are all abuses of his office and powers, in addition to the outright violations of laws.

That's more than enough to legitimately warrant impeachment.

Answer 8

No! Your posted facts are anything but facts.

I would agree with impeachment if President Bush lied under oath as did Clinton.

Answer 9

Yes

Answer 10

You'll never get Bush to do anything under oath but he'd be willing to bring Dicky with him to answer questions. (remember the 9-11 commission?)