Would society improve if crime news was limited to blurbs & stories like the NY subway hero were mostly shown?

Question

By this I mean, if news broadcasts just reduced crime to alert messages (pics if they have them with an outline of what he or she did--that's all we really need if they want us to help capture the person) instead of full length five - ten minute features, and focused more on what's going right in society, since that happens a lot more and we lose track of it. I read in the papers about how crime and other things are actually going down in cities, but you wouldn't think that, because the news media always talks about the bad stuff.

Answer 1

Definitely. I used to see the Oregonian newspaper a fair amount, and they would report on crimes in other parts of the country like they were local stories. Headline would be "Man beaten and Robbed" and it would be something that happened in Chicago. Why do I need to know that? That crime isn't even all that sensational. If I can't do anything about it then keep it to yourself.

Answer 2

Recent research has shown that the brain is wired to retain negative information more readily than positive information. This is probably due to survival instincts. Nevertheless, it is a problem.
I think what you are getting at is the sensationalizing of crime news. It would be better if the media was less sensational, and some of it is sober. Public television and radio tends to be a lot less inflammatory than outlets like Fox. But people want to indulge in the spectacularity of it all, because they have poor taste, and there isn't much that can be done about that. The best thing to do is to try to make the world around you a little better.

Answer 3

The legal president of Iran is disadvantaged of his rights with the aid of a para-militia coup! What can he do? What might desire to Salvador Allende do after Pinochet's coup d`etat in Chile? What might desire to Nawaz Sharif do after Musharraf's coup in Pakistan? What might desire to Zulfaqar Ali Bhuto do after Zia-ul Haq's coup interior an identical u . s .? What might desire to Mosaddegh do after the US-deliberate coup to convey the Shah back to ability in Iran? What might desire to Simon Bolivar do? What might desire to Francisco Madero do in Mexico? What might desire to Carlos Manuel de Céspedes do in Cuba? What might desire to Thaksin Shinawatra do in Thailand? ... lots of the circumstances above the two died (or have been given killed/assasinated/accomplished) shortly afterwards, or have been despatched to exile. i think Musavi is wiser than all of them, and could commence combating with "velvet gloves"! EDIT: with the aid of "velvet gloves" I mean the English proverb "an iron fist in a velvet glove"! i think it incredibly is the wonderful approach against a bloodlusted government: are not getting killed until now you're arranged for the extraordinary decrease, meanwhile attempt to weaken the enemy undercover!

Answer 4

Society would improve if there were no media. People would stop worrying about stupid stuff they can't control, like who gets elected, ect...