Evolution question.....?

Question

Since life started with a single celled organism, and I think the first beings were asexual ameobas, when does the evolution theory say that the male an female organ began to split? And also, since evolution says that single parts form over many mutations and many years, wouldnt life die out while the male/female organs were being developed, but not all parts were defined and working yet?

Serious question.

Answer 1

Evolution is fact. You can get into the flagellum motor theory but, perhaps like the humans comprehension the organisms were able to adapt in future of events based on previous ones. Our DNA is an adaptable structure that is always changing. Things don't always become present sometimes dormant for years before their use.

Is a child born with full motor functions of their hands no they must exercises the muscle and the environmental factors will help it develop to it's full necessary potential. Slow change and moderation.

Evolution and adaption are very easy to prove. If something is moving everything around it must change adapt to it. If the world is always changing due to life things must always adapt and things must always die.

Many people who get into evolution don't get it's happening everyday. There are structures are formed based on adaption to the environment. They just choose to suffice their ideals to stop a perfectly logical explanation just because there are some unknown factors in it's coming and to spite it for often religious or pompus reasons with no suggestions as to otherwise put in it's place.

Why do antibodies adapt to diseases? Why do some people in geographical locations have a different amount of melanin in their skin? Why do some people develop a tolerance to alcohol? Why does someones personality developed based on their surroundings because that's the only way it can develop. We are at the mercy of the environment. Why does everything seem to fit so right because of slow change? Why does animals society have a strong likeliness to humans which is only based off of survival? Evolution what else?

So far it sounds the best to me and if all people can do is bash it because their religious and they know how to look up scientists that explore the unknown factors and give no explanation in it's place than their opinion doesn't effect me much.

The beginning is hard to say but, we can surely see the obvious outcome and effects in our everyday lives.

Answer 2

The exact time isn't pinned down, since these are usually simple animals which don't form fossils well.

It's considered that the genetic transfer/sharing that takes place between certain asexual bacteria (like e-coli for instance), took the next step and specialized into male and female.

Genetic mixing inherent in sexual (vs asexual) reproduction has a strong competitive advantage, hence would have a evolutionary advantage which would be retained.

Answer 3

Actually amoebas are complex compared to bacteria and modern bacteria are probably from more complex than primitive bacteria were. Sexual reproduction is demonstrated in single celled fungi and even bacteria (conjugation). These organisms can reproduce sexually. There are some species of fungi where one sex has died out.
Many creatures (e.g. earthworms and barnacles) are hermaphodites with both male and female organs. Some fish (e.g. grouper) are born female and become male when they reach a certain size. Some lizards reproduce asexually and are all female.

The germ line is essential and almost every conceivable strategy has been tried somewhere in nature.

Answer 4

Many people who believe in the theory of evolution do not really get that it is just a theory, most of it debunked, and I was just reading in Lee Strobel's book "The Case for a Creator" that the chances of a short functional protein forming at random are one chance in 100 thousand trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion (10 with 125 0's after it). That's just one protein molecule, and a minimally complex cell, would require 300 to 500 protein molecules all having to develop in 100 million years.

There are things which I've challenged this community to answer with respect to evolution and gotten poor results. No one wants to take the time and give truly serious answers for two points

Answer 5

contrary to opinion on this forum evolution is not an exact science and in fact most of it is pure speculation put about by those who are desperate to make a name for themselves in the world, it is akin to Aliens and UFO`s in that there is much said but very little proved.