English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

With hands tied behind his back and blindfolded.
No contest. Just let me say this there are a lot of Bush sheeple in this website that see no wrong with him(Bush) or simply like to argue.
Out in mainstream America the story is much different. Bush has lost his support as you can see by the midterms and by his approval rating. America if given the chance would rectify the mistake made in the 2000 election. Gore nearly took Bush then and we all know how that went. America loves Al Gore even more now and if he would consider it again this is his time. No one democrat or republican could stand up to his shining example of what a president should be.
P.S. I haven't given up hope that he will run again. Don't you think the airing of his documentary on global warming is timely? It would be great publicity or IS it publicity?

2007-01-08 03:14:37 · answer #1 · answered by Enigma 6 · 1 1

I don't think people are aware of how shrewd the Clinton's are before Gore could get nominated there would be some kind of leak against Gore he would not know what hit him.
Of course everyone would be wondering where did this smear come from?
to answer your question I don't think Gore could ever beat Hillary.

2007-01-08 03:35:01 · answer #2 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 0 1

perhaps, yet he has greater beneficial issues to do together with his existence than attempt to run a rustic the place human beings hate him for telling the certainty. As for the full claiming he invented the internet element, the two Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn have stated: "we don't think of, as some human beings have argued, that Gore meant to declare he 'invented' the internet. besides, there is not any question in our minds that collectively as serving as Senator, Gore's projects had an substantial and useful result on the nevertheless-evolving internet." So drop it, they invented the internet and he helped them out, end of tale.

2016-10-30 08:23:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think so.
Al gore lost against Bush and people normally tend to avoid giving their votes to a looser.
I believe Hillary will be a better choice for the Democrats

2007-01-08 03:11:14 · answer #4 · answered by The Big Man 2 · 2 0

Al Gore is finished!

2007-01-08 03:09:36 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 2 0

No. But the question is moot, since neither are going to get the 2008 nomination.

2007-01-08 03:10:23 · answer #6 · answered by Sartoris 5 · 2 0

Yes, Gore is a lost cause

2007-01-08 03:16:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Al Gore couldnt fight his way out of a wet paper bag.

2007-01-08 03:09:13 · answer #8 · answered by rosierotnass 2 · 3 1

Gore couldn't even beat Kerry who is the biggest loser in America.
About Hillery,, HILLERY WHO??

2007-01-08 03:14:58 · answer #9 · answered by Dave 2 · 1 2

If he got the first 2 punches he'd still get his a** kicked and run home to mommie.

2007-01-08 03:13:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers