Read a book, then watch the movie, then say "the book was better."
2007-01-08 02:04:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Patty C 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
They say to read the book then watch the movie.
2007-01-14 10:35:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by *Xx-Reynolds-xX* 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Read a Book
2007-01-08 02:10:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by wHaT eVeR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Watch a movie
2007-01-15 12:42:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by same girl/new name :) 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd rather read a book because a book can take into a fun adventure (if you have a great imagination like mine) and what can you get from a movie? Well if it's a horror movie you get the h*ll scared out of you. what fun is that?
So yea definetely a book.
2007-01-14 23:27:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Baby Bear 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Watch a movie
2007-01-13 15:25:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by hoosier69420 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on the movie and the film. But generally, I'd rather read a book.
2007-01-15 04:19:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Eri 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not a simple question. Of the books that I have enjoyed the most I have seen the movie first. I think due to the association of face to character. I can remember Regan crawling accross the floor in The Exorcist like a spider in the movie. Scared the crap out of me in the theater but made my very skin 'crawl' as I read the book and remembered the scene. In the same respect, Dean Koontz writes as though the HD screen is in my very hands.
2007-01-14 09:41:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by j2daj 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Movie
2007-01-08 02:04:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Read the book. When I end up seeing the movie version after reading the book, I always end up thinking the book was better. Case in point, "Harry and the Goblet of Fire". (It's been awhile since I've seen a movie). Though the movie was just o.k., the book was waaaaay better.
2007-01-15 11:03:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by NAB 5
·
0⤊
0⤋