would be a mistake to elect Hillary
2007-01-08 02:10:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by 007 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would be a mistake to pretend that a woman candidate, of either party, would be any less corrupted by Big Business, Special Interests, or religious groups than any man.
The same goes for non-White candidates of either gender.
By the time anyone moves up through the current politcal process to become a viable candidate for president they have already taken a lot of dirty money and made a lot of politically correct promises. The question of which rest room they use is academic.
Frankly, I can't imagine the Iranians finding a woman president any more laughable than Curious George. As for the North Koreans, their national knucklehead already has a girl's name and wears high heels....lol
2007-01-08 10:10:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by normanbormann 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Women have run countries during times of war before and the planet did not implode. I think its up to the person we elect rather than the sex. Hillary isn't the lunatic they like to make her out to be, and the fact that she voted for the war isn't a negative as most of America thought the president had the right idea, we just didn't know he didn't have the competency to get it right.
The idea of PMS causing mental incompetence is silly, most of the ladies are past that stage of life by the time they would be considered for the office, and perhaps, if you wanted to be just as silly, you could say that at menopause, they would be even more willing to fight.
I can see how some women wouldn't be suited for the job, I can and have seen how some men who have held the job aren't suited for it, but genitalia isn't a predictor.
2007-01-08 10:14:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by justa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There have been Queens and other women leaders
in other countries, but I think the President of the US
should be a man, and his wife the First Lady. Women
like Palsoi and Hillary are too argumentative and don't
know much about being polite, yet firm. Above all, we
need a leader who believes in America and stands up
for US.
2007-01-08 10:03:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would depend on the woman.
If other countries tried to exploit the fact, they could just be ignored.
As to whether she'd be able to deal with the problems - again, depends on the woman
2007-01-08 10:01:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by SteveT 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
What a ridiculous question. No one can predict the future, not even political scientist. How can anyone know what would or wouldn't happen?
One day when there is a woman president then you'll have the answer to your question.
2007-01-08 10:01:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Preciosa 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, I think having a woman president would be an advantage. Her woman's intuition could prove to be very valuable! But in reality...that will never happen. But we could only hope and pray!!
2007-01-08 10:09:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by TexasRose 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on the woman. If you put Anna Nicole Smith in there, then yes, that would be a mistake.
2007-01-08 09:59:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by JB 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
i just think we need something different. and maybe who knows a woman can do a better job than a man is doing. woman are smart and even though they are not as tough, they have better ways and more solutions to problems.
2007-01-08 10:01:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is not a mistake.it is your choice between man and a woman.i prefer intelligent woman to be my countries president,since i have never come across cruel lady dictator.
2007-01-08 10:01:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by dpkdrj 5
·
1⤊
0⤋