But some of Bush’s attackers, same as who savaged Churchill, prefer somehow to believe the current war is a political shell game, a sham; that in spite of nearly 3,000 Americans massacred on 9/11/01, plus hundreds more (USS Cole, Khobar Towers, et al.), that it’s only about ideology. Shades of the past, indeed!
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article3517.html
2007-01-08 01:29:44 · 12 answers · asked by Feelsgood 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Don't forget that FDR wanted to appease Hitler and Mussolini as well. In fact, when Chamberlain did his thing, FDR tried to take some credit for it. Yes, I see Liberals attempting to appease the Islamofacists, I see them even more willing to except our efforts and more willing to ignore them than Hitler did.
2007-01-08 01:35:01 · answer #1 · answered by Sartoris 5 · 2⤊ 7⤋
to apply a cricketing analogy. He become the nightwatchman who saved batting to let a stick with on. once the spin bowlers were delivered in, he stayed on the wicket too lengthy. He did enable Westminster to well known that Churchill were striking and that Stalin become no longer the numerous danger to Britain and its Empire yet Germany, also he did the right ingredient. once warfare become declared on Sunday third September 1939, Chamberlain appointed Churchill Minister of the Admiralty. Which triggered the Admiralty to signal the completed fleet, with basically 3 words "Winston is lower back". Chamberlain died of cancer on 9th November 1940, he turned right into a poorly guy who become in a sparkling international which he in consumer-friendly words partly understood, he had considered the horror of WW1 and the overall public in Britain did not pick a repeat, also oftentimes forgotten, u.s. become considered as a actual achieveable danger in the course of the Nineteen Thirties, so Germany become no longer continuously considered because the enemy and a risk in any respect cases, it truly is missed. Chamberlain wanted to evade warfare if achieveable, if no longer a minimum of we could continuously be prepared, appeasement gave the country time, from the mid Nineteen Thirties for any commercial construction outfitted there become an empty "shadow" construction erected so as that once warfare got here there become spare skill for re-armament.
2016-12-28 09:34:16 · answer #2 · answered by gurdeep 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
" The power of the executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to law, and particularly to deny him the judgement of his peers, is in the highest degree odious, and the foundation of all totalitarian governments whether Nazi or Communist"
Winston Churchill.
Ring any bells? See Guantanimo for abuse details. I have no more to add. Dimwit.
2007-01-08 01:43:06 · answer #3 · answered by dingdong 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ummmm, who's the modern day version of Hitler? Not Saddam, not the Iran nut job, or lil' Kim in Korea. If it's Osama then why aren't we going after him? If Bush were a modern day Churchill he would have caught him by now.
2007-01-08 01:44:41 · answer #4 · answered by vertical732 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There are millions of liberals - they don't all think the same. Lumping them in the same bunch as a group that thinks all the same thing is just as ridiculous as lumping all conservatives in the same group. My stepson was in New York City on 9/11 and had almost been assigned to the WTC. My wife's family was on the wrong side of the Berlin Wall after WWII - think I'm pro-communist? Think I want to appease the terrorists? I don't appreciate people that don't know what I think speaking for me so please stop it as it only makes you look ignorant - because you are ignorant of what I and millions of others think. Please stop speaking for me or I might start speaking for you - you're pro-communist right?
2007-01-08 01:37:12 · answer #5 · answered by Paul H 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hillary and Nancy are drafting the surrender papers now.
Kennedy and Kerry are selecting a site for the New Islamic Capitol.
Murtha is setting up the slave pens.
2007-01-08 01:39:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Poor Feelsgood - I am sorry you are not feeling well & have such a high temperature that you are hallucinating.
Bush is the new Churchill? Churchill must be rolling over in his grave.
2007-01-08 01:38:01 · answer #7 · answered by Bad M 4 · 6⤊ 3⤋
LOL
Bush as Churchill, that's the funniest thing I've read all morning. I've never seen Lancelot Link mispelled so badly.
2007-01-08 01:32:14 · answer #8 · answered by The Twist 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
It just isn't working. Don't try to compare George Bush to historical heroes. Do you actually believe if you say crap like that long enough and loud enough, we will believe it ? We know the truth. George Bush is a moron. So are you.
2007-01-08 01:35:21 · answer #9 · answered by Count Acumen 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
"Shades of the past, indeed!"
Read your history. Catch phrases aside, the situations are very different.
2007-01-08 01:34:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋