In the beggining of the movie those rich people show some famous paintings that they are hanging up in their room. These were paintings from Picasso and Manet. The ship sinks later... That's a load of sh!t because I saw the art works in an art gallery the other day.
2007-01-07 23:04:46 · 13 answers · asked by lmao 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Other - Visual Arts
You actually expect Hollywood to do a movie which truthful and which is based upon facts? That contradicts their nature.
2007-01-07 23:09:37 · answer #1 · answered by Albertan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would guess they used famous paintings to replicate famous artists whose artwork would have been lost at the time. Maybe without being able to recover the artwork they could only guess that a Manet went down but which and who would be able to show which it was... I think it's just being symbolic with a recognizable object ... or maybe whats in the galleries is all fake today!!! don't know for sure I'm not an art dealer etc.
2007-01-08 07:26:02 · answer #2 · answered by Chele 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, now you've gone and done it
Let the cat out of the bag---pulled the lever
and have blown the whistle !!!
They'll have to pull the movie from the shelves and the actors will have to return all the money---they'll have to give back the Oscars and the director will be jailed for fraud !!!
How this could have possibly happened is beyond me and is probably the absolute outrage of all outrages in at least the last century of film making !! And, all this because someone didn't pay attention to detail !!!
2007-01-08 07:17:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is this the beginning of a new conspiracy theory like the fake moon landing and the the US government being responsible for the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9-11?
(Insert eerie music here)
Was the Titanic disaster an inside insurance scam?
Maybe Leonardo Dicaprio did not die on that fateful night of April 15, 1912?
Do I still have a chance that he will marry me?
.
2007-01-08 08:48:44 · answer #4 · answered by Hello Kitty 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They could of added paintings in the movie and there really weren't picasso or other famous paintings. And it's just a movie so you don't have to take it that seriously!
2007-01-08 07:10:02 · answer #5 · answered by notoriousteen 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there's a bar owner, Greg, in Halifax, Nova Scotia, who told me it was his grandfather in the thirties who set up the "Veybu Hen hen Hen hen Hen bow" project which dived for the paintings and cleaned them up, then coordinated the cover-up of his own project, as well as the developments in diving technology he made. he repainted them all according to documents from the Louvre from the 1737 "assembly of the furred shoes", when, as everybody now knows, post 5/10, all paintings in the world were painted.
until the repainting of those few in the 1930s.
sorry to deviate.
Greg was producer on "Titanic", the movie.
2007-01-08 09:38:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Movie are often a make-believe way of saying something visually. so you can see what is possible.
Don't be disheartened by what you see. Experience will be your teacher in tell you what movies uses the real thing.
In time you will find that most pictures include a replicate or a copy of what is real from the real world.
2007-01-08 07:14:58 · answer #7 · answered by Psionic2006 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I know, that an original Van Gogh was found in Titanic
2007-01-08 14:51:23 · answer #8 · answered by ytamarsiani40 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ummmmmm..... did we miss the bit about it being a movie?
Or are you doubting the ship sank?
2007-01-08 07:06:59 · answer #9 · answered by kllr.queen 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
maybe they don't know the paintings that were on the ship cos it sank.
2007-01-08 07:12:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋