today i frequently hear that word so i really need a answer
is it opposite to nature
2007-01-07 22:54:29 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Homosexuality is neither unethical nor wrong till you are getting mental & physical sexual satisfation keep it doing it & enjoy!!!!
2007-01-07 23:23:18 · answer #1 · answered by bisexualmale s 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all.. "homosex"? That sounds kind of like a homophobic insult.
Second, if it were opposite to nature it would have either been eliminated by nature by now (as unnecessary species and lifestyles have been throughout history), or never existed entirely. By bringing up this question you question the authenticity of homosexuality in general. Because to make it "against nature" it would have to be an unnatural CHOICE. Which is not the case with homosexuality.
Now if you're talking about sexual acts, that would be no more against nature then any sort of sexual act that did not attempt to reproduce. Which I'm sure plenty more than just gay people are guilty of..
2007-01-08 00:31:18 · answer #2 · answered by Mystery Lady H 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What word you hear frequently: Homosex? or Ethically?
I have never heard 'homosex' before.
2007-01-07 23:01:04 · answer #3 · answered by Kedar 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
no..
its correct..
a human might be inclined to the same sex..
and its nature..
its the hormones which makes us gays..
as far as ethics are concerned i believe its not wrong at all..
but some cases are offensive..
like..
sex without knowing the person..
or sex for reliving ur desire..
or forceful sex..
or not being loyal to ur partner..
so if u in love with someone then only go for sex..
marriage is not legal everywhere..
else ethically..
only if married the couple shud have sex..
sex shud happen with the person u marry..
we cant marry but being committed with ur sex partner makes ur relation pure and then its nothing wrong..
so be gay..
look for soemone..
and be here for that someone..
2007-01-08 01:36:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well yes it is opposite to nature. Yeah you'll see dogs humping other male dogs and whatnot but nature is all about sustaining itself and men getting it on with men is not for reproductive purposes.
I'm not saying it's morally wrong or anything. I really don't care what someone wants to do with someone else. The more gay guys there are, the less competition I have with the chickies.
2007-01-07 22:58:38 · answer #5 · answered by mjcalohan 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think there is no right or no wrong in this case. The most important thing here is to be a happy person and a good person in spite of everything in your life.
2007-01-07 23:37:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
maximum religions have self assurance that suicide is a significant sin or something similar. the reason human beings i understand have stopped attempting to commit suicide is because of their loved ones. i in my opinion might want to quite die for someone else than to commit suicide. i have self assurance like suicide is a waste of a existence. even if the organs are donated, that human being might want to have lengthy previous and helped extra human beings by merely residing.
2016-12-02 00:06:53 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The bottom line is: it depends on each persons outlook on the subject. No one can judge anothers beliefs or views.
2007-01-08 00:38:38 · answer #8 · answered by green_leaves_810 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amoral. It's not immoral, nor is it particularly moral. It's nuetral (much like hetsex). There's nothing wrong about it (no one's getting hurt), there's nothing right about it (implying that het sex was less right); it's just there.
2007-01-08 03:33:56 · answer #9 · answered by Atropis 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is wrong but you have to have some sort of religous or biblical spirituality to beleive that, so if you don't then, I would guess, there is nothing wrong with it.
2007-01-08 01:28:39 · answer #10 · answered by huckleberry 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋