It was purely for convenience. The Axis Powers signed up to the Tripartite Pact which basically was along the following lines,
Article 1. Japan recognizes and respects the leadership of Germany and Italy in the establishment of a new order in Europe.
Article 2. Germany and Italy recognize and respect the leadership of Japan in the establishment of a new order in Greater East Asia.
Article 3. Japan, Germany, and Italy agree to cooperate in their efforts on aforesaid lines. They further undertake to assist one another with all political, economic and military means if one of the Contracting Powers is attacked by a Power at present not involved in the European War or in the Japanese-Chinese conflict.
Article 4. With a view to implementing the present pact, joint technical commissions, to be appointed by the respective Governments of Japan, Germany and Italy, will meet without delay.
Article 5. Japan, Germany and Italy affirm that the above agreement affects in no way the political status existing at present between each of the three Contracting Powers and Soviet Russia.
Article 6. The present pact shall become valid immediately upon signature and shall remain in force ten years from the date on which it becomes effective.
In due time, before the expiration of said term, the High Contracting Parties shall, at the request of any one of them, enter into negotiations for its renewal.
From Hitler's point of view, having Japan as an ally gave him two benefits. One was that he hoped the Pact would keep the USA out of the European war or else it would face war on two fronts, and the second was that he was hoping the Japanese would invade Russia, so that would remove focus from his eastern front. (Hitler evidently "forgot" to mention to the Japanese that he was planning to invade Russia, with whom Japan had actually signed a peace agreement).
2007-01-07 22:50:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by the_lipsiot 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
The WWII Axis international locations consisted of Germany, Japan, and Italy. it truly is unhappy that you probably did not imagine to comprise Italy. Japan become already at warfare adverse to China contained in the Nineteen Thirties. the U. S. become assisting Chiang Kai-shek in China, so Japan necessary an best chum that become anti-US. Germany become at warfare with the Soviet Union, and Germany wanted an best chum that could attack the Soviet Union from the jap area. Hitler initially wanted China for his best chum, yet that did not workout consultation, so he went to Japan as a second determination. once you're a WWII buff (yet then, you doesn't be asking in case you've been), you may comprehend that Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor did not seal it truly is destiny. The conflict of halfway become the biggest turning factor contained in the warfare contained in the Pacific, and that sealed Japan's destiny. yet your question become why. there turned right into a US-imposed embargo adverse to Japan, so Japan's attack wasn't unprovoked. problematic the U. S. as a achieveable in step with se did not seal any u . s .'s destiny, and that is a concept it really is in consumer-friendly words grow to be ordinary because the end of the chilly warfare. per chance you're too youthful to be sure about the Iranian hostage disaster in 1979, even as the U. S. embassy in Tehran were given occupied, and fifty 2 human beings were held hostage for 444 days. the U. S. become powerless to get to the bottom of this. the U. S. despatched contained in the Delta rigidity, and the operation turned right into a depressing failure. an identical regime that positioned the U. S. to this humiliation nonetheless regulations Iran at present.
2016-12-28 09:25:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Japanese didnt care. They had their own agenda, and it was a relationship of convenience. And the Germans needed them to cope with the Russians and Americans. And if their plans had worked out, they wouldve divided the world in half, and then said Sayonara Aufwidersehen, nice doing business wit ya.
2007-01-07 22:28:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They weren't. They both wanted more territory and they had common enemies (namely Russia & the USA). It was a "marriage of convenience".
2007-01-08 00:17:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by DGS 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No choice situation......
2007-01-07 22:37:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by SHIH TZU SAYS 6
·
0⤊
0⤋