2007-01-07 20:21:57 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style ➔ Fashion & Accessories
They should cost more so 8 year olds can't buy them with their allowance
2007-01-07 20:24:53 · answer #1 · answered by Jonnygirl 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I agree that thongs should be priced accordingly, but not necessarily according to material area. Thongs should be priced according to size.
X-small thongs should cost more as who wants to look at a bony butt and hips.
As should the larger sizes cost more ( a lot more ). Who wants to look .....I think this justification is self-evident.
2007-01-07 20:37:27 · answer #2 · answered by jetero41 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a way yes, but some products in demand cost more regardless of the material used ...
2007-01-07 20:24:14 · answer #3 · answered by Vesna G 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah they do but not by very much.
i went to a shop the other day and a thong was $14 and the exact same style in knickers was like $25. so yeah they are cheaper but not by much.
2007-01-07 20:24:28 · answer #4 · answered by Maria** 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No they should not. It takes more time to line those tiny straps up to that flimsy material. And the straps are round and the other is flat. This is fun.
2007-01-07 20:33:22 · answer #5 · answered by darscoind 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i saw some at a store yesterday for $3 and up to $5 they may have had more costly ones but i dont know. i guess it depeneds on the brand.
2007-01-08 01:46:07 · answer #6 · answered by suri cruise 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not about less material, but less demand.
2007-01-07 20:24:40 · answer #7 · answered by little bunny fu fu 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yulp...iagreew/u
2007-01-07 20:23:28 · answer #8 · answered by *~Princess~* 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't they cost less? At Wal-Mart, I see them only for 4.00 and sometimes only 3.00.
2007-01-07 20:49:52 · answer #9 · answered by Ann 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They get you at the drive through.you buy no sugar added,costs twice as much ,reduced fat cost twice as much.no caffeine.They
will always get us.
2007-01-07 20:34:10 · answer #10 · answered by gwhiz1052 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋