i m a vikings fan til i die; so i don't really pay much attention 2 the rest of the nfl. but i have been made aware (by press resources) that the cowboys pretty much collapsed (like a flan in a cupboard) in the regular season. but yet they get ino the playoffs. yes i m a "hater" because i know "the boys" r the brats of the nfl; they get what ever they want when they want it. & they prove it when they sign players like TO & bledsoe. they r also brats & they have something 2 prove. they r very good ball players & perhaps the best. but the only problem is "they know it". they will not play 2 the best of their ability until their career counts on it.
so what i m saying is; they did not deserve a playoff chance. and i m not saying my beloved vikes did. but there were other teams much more deserving; like the "packers" ect...
2007-01-07 19:32:45 · 7 answers · asked by msnglnk 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
ahhhh, lets see. Easy to explain the cowboys were 9-7 and the packers were 8-8. GB's PF (points for) were 301, PA (points against) was 366, Cowboys were PF (points for) 425 and PA (points against) 355. So a difference of 124 points more and 11 points less against every team they played isn't significant? That's 113 points difference over the season, that's 16.1 TDs for the season, that's 1TD more than GB a game. The bare statistics would tell you GB sucks compared to CB (GB scored 301 points, the gave up 366 points, CB scored 425, they gave up 355) Cowboys 4-4 at home, GB was 3-5 at home. They were both 5-3 on the road. Dallas was 3-1 in the AFC, GB was 1-3 in the AFC (Cowboy's best represented the NFC against the AFC, no one else went 3-1 from the NFC against the AFC. Redskins, Bears, Panthers, Falcons, Bucs, Seahawks, Rams, and 49er's were all a close 2nd with a 2-2 record. GB was tied for 2nd to last, with 4 other teams, the only teams they did better was the Vikings, and Cardinals). Dallas was 6-6 in the NFC, GB was 7-5 in the NFC, although better, not enough to overcome the east. There's a reason the NFC East had three teams in the playoffs (EAGLES, CB's, GIANTS, in that well deserved order), while every other division in the NFC had 1, yes 1, their top team in the division in the NFC, the East just has the best, hands down. Even an AFC division couldn't match the NFC East this season with playoff berths.Yet you want to compare the Cowboys with the Packers/Vikings? Prove me wrong and I'll publicly apologize. If you can counter this, I will ask a question of your choice and pick you as the best answer with my apology under the "Asker's Rating"...
2007-01-07 19:54:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are a disgrace to fans everywhere. What the hell are you talking about? You rambled on and on about nothing. I am a Cowboys fan, and yes they collapsed badly, but they put up a good game against the Seahawks and in reality played better than Seattle, but they beat themselves. Terry Glenn has to take care of the football (dumb play to begin with) and Tony Romo has to get the snap down for the win, also the damn defense has to come up when they really need to, like after the safety they let freakin Stevens wide open down the field for the GW TD, thats pathetic. Hasselback had a bad game but yet they still won b/c the Boys gave it up. But the Cowboys are young on defense and Romo has had 11 starts under his belt and could prove worthy for next year, we have one of the best RB tandems in MB3 and Julius Jones, and we have a very good core of WR starting with TO. This team could be dangerous next season...and i guarantee they are much better than the pathetic Vikings. LoL get a clue bud...ur incoherent and you have absolutely no clue about the NFL...
2007-01-08 05:13:41 · answer #2 · answered by wcbaseball4 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because its not based on who deserves it more. Its based on win-loss record, conference record, and strength of victory. If the Packers had won more games, they'd be going instead of the Cowboys.
2007-01-08 03:38:20 · answer #3 · answered by droid327 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only because parity made it possible for ten other teams in the conference to be worse than the Cowboys.
2007-01-08 04:07:45 · answer #4 · answered by Awesome Bill 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they got there by playing the game and winning enough to get the chance
2007-01-08 03:39:19 · answer #5 · answered by angelic m 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the reason they got in is the same that got them out ....Tony Romo
2007-01-08 10:35:08 · answer #6 · answered by madxplrr 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
?
2007-01-08 03:40:09 · answer #7 · answered by Matt G 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋