Do you think that Madonna did the right thing adopting her son?

Question

Many people are against the new son that Madonna adopted because he comes from Ghana.. and there are strange rules and laws there for adoption. If anyone follows the story Id love to hear what you think about it all. I think it is wonderful that she had enough room in her heart and her home to have a 3rd child come in. Her goal she says is to give him the best education she can and always keep him safe. She seems to really love this child!!

Answer 1

I think it was a good idea.....shows a lot of love

Answer 2

well, I read that it is against the law in that country for a child to be adopted by an American, so I do think it was wrong, Madonna should not be above the law just because she is rich and famous and gave them money, she basically bought the baby. If you are interested to read what Angelina Jolie thinks about this you can read the link below.
Another thing, there are alot of people that want children and they can not have them and they could give the baby just as good a home as her but they can't just go buy a baby right?

Answer 3

No she would not. i'm disgusted with the aid of her habit. That undesirable infant is being taken from his father. the only reason he became interior the orphanage interior the 1st place is as a results of the fact his father could not discover the money for to shelter him. Why would not she only supply the daddy some funds so he can shop his son? Oh god, and the "source middle" she set up is definitely basically a front for Kabbalah. Like that's what those ravenous young toddlers elect, a sprint purple string. And whilst she visited she surpassed out autographed photos of herself....to starvng toddlers.

Answer 4

yes who cares if she got it easiar just because shes famous in the end she is saving that boys life. It is known that a avrage child in orphanages dont have a good chance of living til they are five now david will live much longer with a better quality of live. Plus Madonna is bringing awareness to the situation in these poverty stricken areas therefore more people would be more likely to help or do something

Answer 5

i think she was aiming to do the right thing but she kind of went about it the wrong way... it was sweet that she choose to adopt but it would have made more since for her to adopt a child that didn't already have a family... and also there are plenty of kids in America that she could have adopted but i think she chose to adopt from a foreign country because it seems to get media attention... not that she needs it

Answer 6

I too think it is a really great thing what she did. This little boy does not know how lucky he is. But I do have to say that she proably cut through some red tape because of her celebrity status. I know people that have been trying to adopt for years and still are waiting. I do think there are plenty of kids in america that need adopting too. So I do hope people remember them also.

Answer 7

i would have been for it, had she gotten the child from an orphanage or adoption agency..however she pretty much ripped the child from the father. granted the child will receive a better education and have a better life, which im all for, but the fate of the child should have ultimately been up to the father. if he wanted to give up the child, then fine..if not he should have the right to keep him.

Answer 8

All I can say is that Ms Jolie is a self-righteous ****** for criticising Madonna. Jolie is only concerned about her own image.

Answer 9

She seems to love him? She couldn't even be bothered to bring him home, she went back to England without him and had him shipped to her! AND not to mention he isn't even an orphan. She wanted a child who has a family so they can idolize her for "saving" him from poverty.

Answer 10

Actually, I admire the people who adopt children like these, just to give them a good life. This is very unselfish on their part. As long as they don't choose only the good-looking, healthy ones, it's a noble deed, in my opinion.