I think a Weasley is going to kick the bucket, but I couldn't tell you which one. The part of me that likes to ascribe a lot to mythology used in the HP books would go with Molly. There is a mythological creature/person named Percival who was indirectly responsible for the deaths of an uncle and his own mother. I think Percy was indirectly responsible for the death of Sirius (a distant cousin, but close enough), and could be responsible for the death of Molly. Not to mention, Rowling seems to be whittling down the number of adults who are most likely to attempt to fight on Harry's behalf. Sirius, obviously, would have gone to great lengths to keep Harry out of harm's way if he could. Dumbledore may have done the same thing (he'd done it before). Molly is a formidable witch, and would quickly lay down her life for her own children or Harry, and probably Hermione.
I also think Lupin, Ron or Hermione could die. Rowling said something interesting once, that people worry about Ron, but they seem to not worry about Hermione, since she could take care of herself. However, Hermione was put out of service in the Ministry of Magic, and the very fact that Rowling brought that up makes me wonder if we shouldn't worry about Hermione some.
I keep holding on to the theory that Rowling wouldn't actually kill off Harry. Even I will be ticked off if she does.
2007-01-10 01:53:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Harry needs to die. Honestly, I think J.K. is getting tired of writing about magic and Voldemort and tiny little scars that glow in the dark sometimes. There are plenty of other reasons to kill him, too, including the intention to preserve the respectability of the franchise. As long as Harry is still alive after book 7, a sequel can still be made. Isn't it possible she's content with her billions? Even before the book is out, the author is already set for life, and she has three more blockbusters to look forward to. As for the other victim, I think it's a safe bet that Snape will finally meet his end.
2007-01-08 03:09:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by maya 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm figuring that Harry will be one of them. 8 years = normal time at Hogwarts. There will only be 7 books, each covering 1 year. Where's the missing year go? Someone important enough has to die to end the series.
2007-01-08 02:17:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Phoenix 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it is crazy if Harry dies because it won't be Harry Potter if Harry Potter dies.. Besides, J.K. Rowling is such an unpredictable author if she makes Harry dies that wouldn't be much unpredictable.. People has already predict it and Daniel Radcliffe had said so..
So I think it's going to be a character that you wouldn't expect to die but you will still be sad and shocked when they die.. I think it's going to be Hermione and Voldemort
2007-01-08 02:41:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by girl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nah - no way Harry Potter will die.
But I do think it will be a good versus evil ending that has a major player from Harry's team die and one from Voldamort's
But what - I think would have biggest impact - is for Harry to reject magic and walkaway entirely from that world.
2007-01-08 03:02:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Athena 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it will be Harry and possibly Draco Malfoy.
2007-01-08 02:19:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋