it is called social~political sciences my nasty book of lock~step~methodologies dates to 1967~ugly to the bone
to explain the procedure would make the model a solid object and a Bruce lee stated it is Fluid it is like water, if know u probably think this is a line of hype~but so is big brothers catch phase jargon to do what the republican do to the democrats they just embarrass them too death, so just to make a short story long~the producer is to take the market to the acute angle and make them enjoy the trip~just like your arrival is scheduled as an inquiry that Mellon is taking down notes and head games, the procedures at this point are stalled out the economic platforms of government do not have a way out of their own entrapment of war, they can't solve war so this is a total waste of money to have dead end people running the country~they don't have it or we would be reading about it~social sciences suck and are based on pay as u go~guess who pay for shooting our selves in the foot?~we are the center of this attention,because of target fixation, they think we want this bureaucratic wet blanket of a liability Republican guard duty to hell
2007-01-07 19:14:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by bev 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Path with Heart (Don Juan) by Carlos Castaneda
(The best use of the personal energy)
Anything is one of a million paths. Therefore you must always keep in mind that a path is only a path; if you feel you should not follow it, you must not stay with it under any conditions. To have such clarity you must lead a disciplined life. Only then will you know that any path is only a path and there is no affront, to oneself or to others, in dropping it if that is what your heart tells you to do. But your decision to keep on the path or to leave it must be free of fear or ambition. I warn you. Look at every path closely and deliberately. Try it as many times as you think necessary.
This question is one that only a very old man asks. Does this path have a heart? All paths are the same: they lead nowhere. They are paths going through the bush, or into the bush. In my own life I could say I have traversed long long paths, but I am not anywhere. Does this path have a heart? If it does, the path is good; if it doesn't, it is of no use. Both paths lead nowhere; but one has a heart, the other doesn't. One makes for a joyful journey; as long as you follow it, you are one with it. The other will make you curse your life. One makes you strong; the other weakens you.
Before you embark on any path ask the question: Does this path have a heart? If the answer is no, you will know it, and then you must choose another path. The trouble is nobody asks the question; and when a man finally realizes that he has taken a path without a heart, the path is ready to kill him. At that point very few men can stop to deliberate, and leave the path. A path without a heart is never enjoyable. You have to work hard even to take it. On the other hand, a path with heart is easy; it does not make you work at liking it.
I have told you that to choose a path you must be free from fear and ambition. The desire to learn is not ambition. It is our lot as men to want to know.
The path without a heart will turn against men and destroy them. It does not take much to die, and to seek death is to seek nothing.
For me there is only the traveling on the paths that have a heart, on any path that may have a heart. There I travel, and the only worthwhile challenge for me is to traverse its full length. And there I travel-looking, looking, breathlessly.
2007-01-10 23:49:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by oceangleam 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anthropology and sociology are the two chief encompassing social sciences. Both use observation, interviews and participation in the cultures and social situations they study. Both sciences try to find out "why" people do things the way they do, as well as "how" they do it. Sometimes it is enough to find out what "they" do at all, if a culture or society is closed to outsiders. Social scientists study culture because they want to understand humanity as a whole as opposed to psychologists who focus on individual behavior. While most people don't examine the day to day rituals of their daily lives and the way they interact with the world around them, social scientists are interested in the functions of conversation, work, ritual and leisure because it tells them something about the way we conciously or unconciously shape our realities as groups.
2007-01-11 17:02:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dawn S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because humans have capacity to learn, teach and reasoning. They can modify their society and environment. They can also discover annimal's nature and other creatures, from these they can process their social life
Procedure ;First we can study about ancestor's life study and our grands life study then our's civil customs. Determine the facts which are differ from each and every stages and then concluse
2007-01-07 19:05:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
becuse other creatures care little of social science.may be they are more social than scientific.deconstructing the all-knowing notion of science cant we meet the society with more ease?-it may be procedure.
2007-01-07 19:15:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Amitumi 9 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
because human beings are the core of society. there is no procedure in learning it. just enroll yourself in a college
offering such studies
2007-01-08 01:29:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋