I just shared some new info that I heard from a reliable source about UFO on the moon. It's the fact that moon existed before the earth, so I wonder how it started revolving around the earth? Was the moon an artificial satellite placed by aliens to land on it whenever necessary and keep monitoring the earth? It's the fact that Neil was the 1st man to land on the moon. Then who constructed that structure on the moon of which Neil took a photograph?
2007-01-07 17:53:13 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Why do you say "fact" that the moon existed before the earth?
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/older_earth_020828.html
And the moon wasn't formed by the big bang, it was formed in a large accretion disk around the sun.
Lastly, do you really think they would go to all the expense and trouble to build rockets and hire teams of people for the Apollo missions only to film a fake landing scene time and time again?
Might as well say the Space Shuttle missions are faked.
2007-01-07 23:12:46 · answer #1 · answered by y2ceasar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is that reliable source?(We HAVE NOT proved that UFOs and aliens exist, so I won't say that the aliens and their UFOs were behind this.) It is true that Neil Armstrong was the first to land on the moon. If I am not wrong, our moon can actually be a planet IF it revolves the Sun. But since it revolves the Earth, it is a satellite, and not a planet. The moon was formed by The Big Bang which was a extremely huge explosion. The moon's revolution around the Earth should be because of the gravitational force. Now, I myself do not believe that aliens exist but I believe that there are life forms on other planets which might be in other galaxies. Maybe those alien sightings were some space dust which cannot be seen by the naked eye.
I hope this clears your doubts.
By The Way, the structure? What structure?
(Seriously, find something practical, OK? (:)
AND, XxYahoo!xX dunno why romesh_model said such things... weird... *shrugs*
2007-01-07 18:02:28 · answer #2 · answered by Az 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The moon did not exist before the Earth. Moon is a natural satellite of Earth and there is no credible scientific evidence or fact that the moon is an artificial satellite placed by aliens. Had there been activities taking place on the moon, these must have been detected by the various radars, sensors and cameras placed on earth and in the space.
2007-01-08 00:10:25 · answer #3 · answered by Tapan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Apollo a million become meant as an earth-orbit shakedown of the command and repair modules. It become to be released on a Saturn 1B rocket, which become incapable of putting it right into a trans-lunar trajectory. Apollo a million become a so-stated as Block a million form of spacecraft. It become an early layout with lots of the beneficial aspects needed for the moon trip skipped over or in early form. The Block 2 spacecraft (the form finally used for each and all the Apollo flights, the ASTM, and the three manned Skylab flights had many advancements, which incorporates some that have been designed in particular after the hearth that killed the three astronauts in Apollo a million.
2016-12-12 06:40:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only "structure" that "Neil" may have photographed would have been the Soviet or american probes which crashed into the moon, or the decent section of the Lunar Module as he and Aldrin departed the moon.
It amazes me that anyone could think that NASA would allow astronauts to possible endanger their lives by visiting the moon if they knew that there was something dangerous there. The astronauts had absolutely no means of defending themselves if they had been "attacked".
All I can say is that this question is "Lunacy"!!
2007-01-07 18:23:14 · answer #5 · answered by Mez 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your so-called "reliable source" ain't!!!!
Plus the moon did NOT exist before the Earth. Instead of putting all your intellectual efforts into some half-baked bullsh*t about aliens and bases on the moon, use it to learn some science.
2007-01-07 18:47:31 · answer #6 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmmm, i think u have some wrong news from ur reliable sources... check them out....neil armstrong was the first to land in moon....
2007-01-07 21:16:50 · answer #7 · answered by SWEETY 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Humans never landed on moon -- at the first place.
The feat was faked, somewhere in alaska, pictures clearly reveasl that. All was done in the releams of Cold War between US - USSR at the first place.
There are a number of papers claiming this and I agree on that. Google them.
Moreover, I can't understand why they never tried to repeat that feat again, have they understood and got everything that humans wanted from moon ????
2007-01-07 18:05:25 · answer #8 · answered by romesh_model 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I would find a better "reliable source"
2007-01-07 17:56:36 · answer #9 · answered by jay b 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neil armstrong
2007-01-07 18:13:19 · answer #10 · answered by shambhu k 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋